Did... you just look up fallacies on Wikipedia and copy and paste?

No, you didn’t, again you showed one game who’s season pass includes all DLC. I can show one that doesn’t: Destiny 1.

Yes, you’re wrong and I unequivocally proved it. Do you have any evidence to the contrary? No? Ok, you’re wrong.

1) No it doesn’t since many games have additional features, items, DLCs, etc... not covered by the season pass. So, I’d still end up having to pay even more in most cast.

So, then buy the $60 game plus the Season Pass for however much. According to your statement, you’d be perfectly fine with that. That gives you everything the game has to offer and you won’t pay a cent more.

Still below the $120 adjusted for inflation price. Games for NES were $50 about 35 years ago. That $50 then is worth about $120 today.

Well... it kind of is. You’ve professed an astounding incompetence when it comes to gun safety. So, I think I speak for everyone when I say we’d prefer you to not have a gun.

Your attitude is why the right accuses the left of trying to take away their God given right to protect themselves and their family, and why the trust necessary to regulate guns never materialized in the last 8 years.

Hahahahahhaa... you are the posterboy for extremely strict gun regulation. Every person familiar with a gun would say you’re an idiot.

Your point fails to make any impact because we’re talking about the US. If you can afford $11, you can afford $14. If you can’t, drop the service because Netflix probably isn’t as important as eating or paying rent.

People will break laws and so there has to be an enforcement mechanism so that people don’t break them.

Really? First, $60 for 40-100 hours worth of entertainment is about the cheapest form of entertainment you’ll find aside from maybe Netflix.

Really? First, $60 for 40-100 hours worth of entertainment is about the cheapest form of entertainment you’ll find…

Editor’s note: GameSpot has updated the penultimate paragraph in this review to provide further clarification on the types of drops available through paid loot boxes.

I’m willing to bet, while the particular shows vary from person to person, if you look at people who spend the same amount of time watching TV, they watch a similar proportion of shows.

Well, I agree, if you’re going to use VR to replace watching a movie on a 4K screen (hell, even a 1080p screen) you’ll be disappointed. However, I will note, when in bed, if my wife is watching something I consider unwatchable, I’ll pop on my Daydream and watch Netflix and that’s a pretty good solution.

I know it’s like trying to regulate something that seems near impossible. Figure out what is fast enough to be acceptable for semi-automatic and set that as the maximum rate of fire. If some people can pull a trigger faster than that, oh well, now they can’t.

So... because nothing is 100% effective, the answer is do nothing?

No, my argument is that you shouldn’t pass a law that has no deterrent effect which is exactly what the law you proposed lacks.

So... your argument is that we shouldn’t make laws because people will break them? Do people who make this absurd argument do it intentionally are do they not realize it’s a stupid argument?

There’s an easy way to get around designing around a specified item. Make a law that mandates a firing rate no faster than X. That way, you can try to modify it any which way you want, if it fires faster than X, it’s illegal.