So, you’re saying that Trump’s tax plan is bullshit? I can support that, because it is. Under his plan, those in that range you’ve identified will unequivocally pay more (we’ll, let’s narrow that down to incomes between $200,000 - $400,000, that makes speaking about brackets easier).

As a tax attorney married to a physician we started our professional lives in the top 10% and we’ll end in likely the top 0.1%. Taxing the rich more heavily will not see us “give up everything we worked so hard for.”

No one raises a child (let’s drop the idea that being a scumbag is only a male thing) to be this way and no amount of good parenting will prevent a person to be like this.

Dude, you’ve been caught in several lies. I think we both know who here is debating with facts and evidence and who is making shit up.

Oh, I’m sorry, did I miss the memo where “Expansion” and “Season” are now the same word? Hmm... I guess I and the rest of the English speaking world missed that one. And, citing a blog or forum isn’t exactly going to support your point. So... try again.

Did... you just look up fallacies on Wikipedia and copy and paste?

No, you didn’t, again you showed one game who’s season pass includes all DLC. I can show one that doesn’t: Destiny 1.

Yes, you’re wrong and I unequivocally proved it. Do you have any evidence to the contrary? No? Ok, you’re wrong.

1) No it doesn’t since many games have additional features, items, DLCs, etc... not covered by the season pass. So, I’d still end up having to pay even more in most cast.

So, then buy the $60 game plus the Season Pass for however much. According to your statement, you’d be perfectly fine with that. That gives you everything the game has to offer and you won’t pay a cent more.

Still below the $120 adjusted for inflation price. Games for NES were $50 about 35 years ago. That $50 then is worth about $120 today.

Well... it kind of is. You’ve professed an astounding incompetence when it comes to gun safety. So, I think I speak for everyone when I say we’d prefer you to not have a gun.

Your attitude is why the right accuses the left of trying to take away their God given right to protect themselves and their family, and why the trust necessary to regulate guns never materialized in the last 8 years.

Hahahahahhaa... you are the posterboy for extremely strict gun regulation. Every person familiar with a gun would say you’re an idiot.

People will break laws and so there has to be an enforcement mechanism so that people don’t break them.

Really? First, $60 for 40-100 hours worth of entertainment is about the cheapest form of entertainment you’ll find aside from maybe Netflix.

Really? First, $60 for 40-100 hours worth of entertainment is about the cheapest form of entertainment you’ll find…

Editor’s note: GameSpot has updated the penultimate paragraph in this review to provide further clarification on the types of drops available through paid loot boxes.

I know it’s like trying to regulate something that seems near impossible. Figure out what is fast enough to be acceptable for semi-automatic and set that as the maximum rate of fire. If some people can pull a trigger faster than that, oh well, now they can’t.

So... because nothing is 100% effective, the answer is do nothing?

No, my argument is that you shouldn’t pass a law that has no deterrent effect which is exactly what the law you proposed lacks.