Where did you get information that “picture was taken before the event even started?” I haven’t seen that.

If her conscience prevented her from performing her statutory duties, she could have, probably should have, been simply dismissed without prejudice. (Yes, I see the irony in my phrase, “without prejudice.”)

What “shitpost” do you refer to? I see only photos, which are simply factual information. Would the new administration prefer that government outlets provide only flattering facts? Would the public ever have seen the photos, if they had not been released before the administration could suppress them?

What “critique of head of state” do you refer to? I see only photos, which are simply factual information. Would the new administration prefer that government outlets provide only flattering facts? Would the public ever have seen the photos, if they had not been released before the administration could suppress them?…