@OMG! Spinnies!: I caught wind of your funny. I sea what you did there.

F*ck yeah Rochester #2 for snow! I'll take it.

@AV-WAVE: Right? Off to find a hi-res. Its one of those can't-look-away types.

Yeah, um, this is not the carriers fault. Their products are not dangerous. This is akin to saying guns are dangerous. Guns are not inherently dangerous. They just sit there. It is how they are used. Phones just sit there too. Phones are not dangerous.

It's a thundersnow!

Check your inbox,

That moon reference seems interesting after hearing Buchheits comment the other day.

Last time I viffed a harrier, I woke up with a rash.

@OMGItsWeasel: Concur. Whats the one they use with the strings, it was used in some movie with a twist.. this is gonna drive me nuts.. maybe inception? or that really terribly zombie movie set in ireland? aahhhh forget it.

Giz, am disappoint. no XKCD yet?

Most of the women you'll meet who will throw down in your car on a first date are... very much like the car, I'd imagine.

Aviation Tech has come along way. Look at that little thing carrying that big plane around.

@Admiral_Awesome: Wait but I think then if there was weight transfer... and still enough power.. then it would still apply. Aerodynamics within the first 30ft of a launch are not doing anything.

Is there like, a reasonable, physics-defined minimum 0-60 time? I am not smart.

yo, uh, hello? They make turbos too. So like, thats a three-fer in a sense.

Ok, well, hang on. If this was "Students now allowed to use AutoCorrect on Exams" it would truly spell the downfall of literacy.

A Proposal from the Committee in charge of Mod'eh'sty:

[www.morenewmath.com]

Lot of haters up in here.