There's no CA there- it's definitely on your end, whether it's the white balance of the video or the white balance of your monitor.

Sony already had the basic technology, and iterating their in-house stuff up to '5-axis' capability isn't that big of a deal; the larger advance is doing so within the confines of a mirrorless camera :).

I have a night shot on my 6D at 10,000 ISO where I had to drop the shutter speed to 1/8 on my 24/2.8 IS- suffice to say that while not *all* of the current optical image stabilization systems are so effective, some are rather surprising in their effectiveness.

Hell, the D750 is still technically low-end- check out the D4S, or the 1D X from Canon, or Pentax's 645Z!

That's one that got missed. EVFs show a processed image, and that processing takes time. It's one of the primary reasons that Sony's otherwise superbly executed A77 II cannot take off in the action market as say Canon's 7D II or a potential Nikon D300s successor.

When not using them causes washed out shots- you use the fracking hood. When not getting the shot means not getting paid, you don't not use the hood.

One hand on the lens, one hand on the grip and dials, eye on the viewfinder- whatever the control setup of a camera is, if it can't be handled as such, it's wrong :).

Digital sensors have already exceeded the resolution that film is capable of for most formats. 70mm would be an exception as cinema-quality sensors can't begin to approach that size, yet.

I'd be willing to bet that 70mm film with modern lenses and processes would still produce far higher apparent resolution than a 4k camera. 70mm is huge, while we're at best hitting 80MP on 645 (54mm on the long side) with old CCDs, and 54MP on a smaller crop of 645 using a modern CMOS sensor from Sony. 4k, at 8.3MP,…

To think, one can find union thugs on blogs like this... you guys are moving up in the world!

What is going to get promoted in a union state? How about a Right to Work state?

The only difference is forced union membership.

But that's what championing unions means; having no 'desire to champion unions' means Right to Work, and that's simply the lack of forced union membership by the state.

It's possible, that's for sure, with updates to Thunderbolt. I was more speaking to current implementations in Apple hardware and why that would be a deterrence.

That's not really feasible- Thunderbolt, while having gobs of bandwidth for actual displays or storage, still falls considerably behind in having enough bandwidth to feed a high-end video card at full tilt.

Bad comparison- the Chevy engine would do just fine :)

Worker's rights? Yes. Unions? Sure. Forced union membership? Go f—- yourself.

The viewfinder and slightly more compact size would sway me toward the Sony, but the build quality and controls of the Canon are certainly appealing...

I found a (much beefier) grip for my EOS-M that has an integrated Arca-Swiss plate, that doesn't interfere with controls or battery and memory card changes. That camera's design is decidedly similar to the S-series, with a touch-screen and available manual exposure settings but very limited physical controls.

They're basically interchangeable, especially when talking about the category that the G7 X and RX100-series slot into. And point-and-shoot typically means a fixed-lens camera, which most compact cameras are; only the 1" interchangeable lens systems from Nikon, Pentax, and Samsung would really qualify as compact…

When researching large-sensor compacts with decent zooms the other day, the RX10 emerged as basically the camera 'to get' if you can deal with the size and nearly 2lbs of heft!