Did we ever find out who the mysterious woman silhouette was? Somewhere in the snow, with henchpeople? We saw her from behind only and I think she took a phone call or something. I feel like it was implied it was Rose, but we never found out that it was Rose.

But we never got to hear her sing! This is the true crime. It’s like the equivalent of a red shirt.

Yes! Which reminds me... for all the studying Gina did, why does Jane say “I told you I was judgmental two days after we met!” - they met long before that!

It gives me Wonderfalls flashbacks every time. And that’s good.

I think you’re right about what she meant, but I totally think that’s nuts. Talking about the Bechdel-Wallace test is talking about how women characters talk about things. It’s not just passing the test, it’s Feminist, it’s raising awareness, it’s unlacing decades of harm.

I am here from the slightly future to say! Yup, it was super cartoony. I wasn’t laughing, not because of a needle perfectly threaded, but because it was kind of supposed to be funny and it wasn’t. Why wouldn’t they just go talk about it in the office? They sit in front of each other ALL DAY. Why do it here?

Followup: There’s definitely Graduate stuff in the show. Surprised? No. Happy to be right about something on the Internet? Well, sure!

I see a Graduate ending. The grandmother of much of BoJack Horseman.

Another anachronism, though “possibly an intentional error made by a character” i.e. unreliable memory. But it still bugged me. The three-prong grounded outlet in Bojack’s childhood apartment, when his parents were poor and the place had clearly not been updated in years. Three-prong outlets were invented in the 20s…

FWIW, it’s also what you get when you add sugar and cream (and, well, churn it, etc)

Am I the only one who thinks the quick transition of a servant chopping off the head of a bush is a quick nod to “Another Period”?

I come from the future with this comment!

When I was in college, I was writing a musical. As I did, I realized gradually how intoxicatingly powerful the writer’s role is. You can make these fictional people (and later, real people!) do whatever you want. I had them swearing, screwing, and using each other, as well as singing and such. I feel like most writers…

I come from the future to say: Oh my god that TV dinner idea is perfection.

I come here from the year 2017 to say, that is incredibly astute.

(and whoa wtf super incredibly later this had better be important)

I totes agree except I thought the kiss at the end was really forced and artificial. Especially the music. I am totally on board with their dating, but that kiss felt fake and I was certain it would be revealed as someone’s fantasy - or poignantly, somehow revealed that they had both fantasized it.

Respectfully, everyone with a OTP inclined mind, this is a wonderful show for you in that it plays with that ball, but a terrible show for you in that the truest relationship in it is family, and family is a series of choices and happenstance, and that’s closer to actual reality (while still being a lighter, airier…

This was a C episode of an excellent show. Some of the cinematography felt beginner level. A lot of lines felt so first-drafty, I was sneezing at them. I loved the general idea and direction, and about half of the specifics, but in a lot of ways it was like, a fan produced episode. It went through a lot of what…

No opening credits/theme here either. How many times has a show aired without even a reference to the opening credits or a title or anything? I feel like that wasn’t even legal or possible according to some basic physical laws until the very recent past.