Nailed it.

What about murder? Is the morality of murder subjective?

You seem to have completely missed the part where she talks about how there are appropriate venues for wearing this clothing. It's like you didn't even read the 3 paragraphs worth of text before deciding to speak.

Yeah, the idea of babies feeling pain as you dismember them alive is SUUUUPER morbid. Why can't conservatives focus on the positive side of abortion, like the fact that women can get back to blogging without having to worry about the human they brought into existence???!

He never said it was so artistic it couldn't be understood. He took the opposite approach and made it about something base—jealousy. This article couldn't have reported the facts more incorrectly.

Or...if you're a woman, you could shut the fuck up about what men should wear or not wear since you're probably always bitching about men or "society" (which you represent the majority of) doing it to you.

You realize that you—presumably an adult—are glorying in the emotional distress of 5th grade children who have been very clearly steered to their current vision of reality through no fault of their own, which has been violated?

That's because both movies sucked. The book for Gone Girl sucked, as well. Wild was at least a good book, but the adaptation was poor. It was sloppy, slow, and disjointed at times. And try looking at every past year's nominations to see films nominated for best picture that didn't also get best director or best…

That's because sex organs and breasts DON'T compare.

The women's movement isn't interested in talking about anything other than women. This talk was clearly part of that agenda.

You're not going to comment on the statement she made about the "facts" clearing her being bullshit? You editorialize every domestic violence story where the perp or suspect is male, but you barely report when it's a woman, and only then with none of the editorializing and gnashing of teeth. Your staff should be…

What's unbelievable is that in 2015 women still think a human being wholly distinct from them on a genetic level is somehow "their" body. That's what's fucking crazy.

As a professional artist myself, I also find beauty in the female form—but no more so than I find in the male form. The only part of me that finds more beauty in the female form is the heterosexual male—not the artist. The popular conceit that the female form is more attractive to the eye is intellectually dishonest,…

I'm curious why the author thinks it would've been a "real shame" to have a game with two homosexual (if you know the story, you know there's homosexual overtones) men in it instead of these homosexual women.

Way to sneak that mainstream sexism in there at the end by turning this issue from one about artistic integrity into your sexual aesthetics.

Also, didn't you see the story running today about how they retouched Justin Beiber's photo? So don't even act like this only happens to women or that this is ANY kind of proof that it happens to them more, even.

You know you're all getting trolled, right? This didn't actually happen. The photoshopping was all done by the reddit poster, and made to look like a scan.

This article is so tone deaf, it's crazy.

"But seriously: do not take pictures of yourselves having sex..."

If I suddenly had a different body, I'm sorry, but I think I can say authoritatively (on myself) that I still wouldn't give two fucks about what other people were doing. Other people don't just "affect" me. Sometimes (with people I know and respect) I let myself feel "affected" by people and then choose to behave…