If being too drunk to consent to sex is a thing (even if you literally say yes) then isn't being too drunk to consent to payment a thing (even if you literally say yes)? What's good for the goose is good for the gander. The issue could be as pedestrian as a cab fee or as serious as rape, but your logic doesn't get to…

It's the passing lane. As long as you are about to pass someone (which he clearly was) you can be in that lane. It does not matter that the people behind you might be able to pass you quicker than you can pass the person you're going to. That's the law on the books in almost every state.

It's the passing lane. As long as you are about to pass someone (which he clearly was) you can be in that lane. It does not matter that the people behind you might be able to pass you quicker than you can pass the person you're going to. That's the law on the books in almost every state.

The semi WAS breaking. They don't slow down very fast.

It's the passing lane. As long as you are about to pass someone (which he clearly was) you can be in that lane. It does not matter that the people behind you might be able to pass you quicker than you can pass the person you're going to. That's the law on the books in almost every state.

Thanks for telling us how to behave, Brit. It's a good thing you're the arbiter of other people's behavior, and that you concern yourself so much with it.

Which is a nice alternative to the women on this site who side with a woman against a man every single time—no exceptions. You kindof cancel each other out that way. It's nice.

Sorry, but you seem to have left the logic part out of your argument. Did you mean to add in some more information to discredit your former friend? Because nothing you said does that.

The witch hunt for the rapist was hardly the interest of the conservative writers. They were looking into details that would discredit her—not support her claims. Randos on the internet—not unlike those in your comments section—were the ones who called to identify him. There is no paper trail to connect the…

Preach it! A human being feeling the pain of being burned alive with saline solution and then dismembered while alive is HARDLY an excuse to put a woman out. It's 2014 for crissakes!

I find it more than a bit irresponsible that you continue to report on Aaron—making this part of a pseudo-news narrative rather than simple gossip—without doing the research to add the context to the story that Aaron is a serious, hardcore drug addict who really desperately needs rehab. I know several people who have…

You really don't get it, do you? The military attracts the worst men at their worst age. That's what you're dealing with. They take people who want to commit crimes and give them an outlet to do it, and discipline them so that they don't do it as much over a long period of time.

Yeah, cause the writing staff at Jezebel is well-known the world over for its sense of humor.

There's nothing anywhere in the Bible that says you can expect to be miserable if you decide to follow Christ. Even the verse you quote pretty clearly steers clear of qualifying the experience as negative. Read much?

The victim isn't "tossed aside." Are you ONLY allowed to have conversations about the victim? Are we to be barred from having nuanced conversations about the perpetrators?

Too bad Jezebel continues to ignore the developments in the case of the lecherous female teacher: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/shelley-d…

Punching a police officer, and then menacing to do it again by charging at him DOES merit the use of deadly force. Defense PRECLUDES it from being an execution. Go get a fucking education.

That's because Michael Brown brought about the situation where he sustained those injuries. He wasn't a victim. He was the fucking problem.

Either you have a strange sense of humor, or you're full of shit. I've got 3 sisters, man. I don't use women. Never have, never will.

Try and fail. I wouldn't even call the results mixed.