Even with the drawn out introduction to how she came to work in this profession, this entire article reads like it was written by someone who despises the people she covers, and one can't help but wonder why she continues to do it?

Someone help me understand. An aggressive journalist publicly doxxes the sordid details of an executive, and he simply suggests doing the same to her—but he is unprofessional, whereas she is the height of professionalism?

Of course, her "male counterpart" being the inimitable Tommy Lee Jones, an actor who's been working as such since 4 years before she was born, would have nothing to do with the financial disparity, would it?

It's a pretty simple answer: a troll.

Women blame other women for relationships that tank. There are no men in that equation. I submit the source story here as anecdotal evidence of this fact.

Somebody might have told him, but he's entitled to his poor taste.

Literally everything you do that gets enough attention on the internet will get you "death threats." Develop a video game? Death threats. Release an album? Death threats. Write an article for a site with hundreds of thousands of pageviews daily? Death threats.

"But it's fine. With an all-male masthead, I'm sure the Post's editorial sidewill continue to be as sensitive and responsive as it's always been to the needs and concerns of its female staffers and readers."

You just used a sexist term ("dick") to deride someone for behavior you can't even begin to substantiate based on the most specious claims available. Well done.

Why would a flat out denial take the form of an apology, Erin?

It's more about the murder, hon. It's not really about the money. I don't know what gave you that impression. The murder. Not money.

I work in marketing and advertising, and it's funny how people like me take things like this for granted. It's a cool background. That's why. But your prosaic question really made me laugh hard. Well done.

It's the same level of "phenomena" of women who have camel toe in their yoga pants, or women who don't wear bras under their thin shirts, or any number of other "phenomena" that you would get a tongue lashing here for. That's the point. It's degrading an entire gender because of what some people allow themselves to go…

Locking a child in their room is NOT—in and of itself—an "abuse," because you—as their parent—have the right to do this, and they do not have a right to wander about as they please. They do have a right not to be locked in a room so long that it is harmful to their development, but the "stress" or "displeasure" that…

When the discussion is about clothing, and not about politics, no one is "overlooking" anything. You don't start a conversation about clothing with a discussion on slavery from over a century ago. Are you fucking crazy?

On behalf of all white people everywhere—Kara—I apologize for everything that happened to your ancestors after their neighboring tribe sold them to white people. Incidentally, not everything about the antebellum period was absolute shit. Just like today, people who do shitty things also sometimes do good things. For…

I have to question anyone doing statistical research who believes that 400 respondents to her survey represent the entirety of #gamergate — or even a "statistically significant" portion of them. The research may have been insightful prior to these idiots getting ahold of it, but the lack of academic prowess on the…

Considering that the average American woman strikes her children more than once a day (starting when they are as young as 7 months old), I'd say you might be on to something.

If you don't side with your spouse over your child, you don't have a healthy marriage. Full stop. Now, it could be that you don't side with them because they are a monster and your child was hurt by them, but then—again—it's because you don't have a healthy marriage. You couldn't have a healthy marriage with a…

sorry, when did you get conclusive proof that the allegation was true? i must've missed that.