Preach it! A human being feeling the pain of being burned alive with saline solution and then dismembered while alive is HARDLY an excuse to put a woman out. It's 2014 for crissakes!

I find it more than a bit irresponsible that you continue to report on Aaron—making this part of a pseudo-news narrative rather than simple gossip—without doing the research to add the context to the story that Aaron is a serious, hardcore drug addict who really desperately needs rehab. I know several people who have…

You really don't get it, do you? The military attracts the worst men at their worst age. That's what you're dealing with. They take people who want to commit crimes and give them an outlet to do it, and discipline them so that they don't do it as much over a long period of time.

Yeah, cause the writing staff at Jezebel is well-known the world over for its sense of humor.

There's nothing anywhere in the Bible that says you can expect to be miserable if you decide to follow Christ. Even the verse you quote pretty clearly steers clear of qualifying the experience as negative. Read much?

The victim isn't "tossed aside." Are you ONLY allowed to have conversations about the victim? Are we to be barred from having nuanced conversations about the perpetrators?

Too bad Jezebel continues to ignore the developments in the case of the lecherous female teacher: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/shelley-d…

Punching a police officer, and then menacing to do it again by charging at him DOES merit the use of deadly force. Defense PRECLUDES it from being an execution. Go get a fucking education.

That's because Michael Brown brought about the situation where he sustained those injuries. He wasn't a victim. He was the fucking problem.

Either you have a strange sense of humor, or you're full of shit. I've got 3 sisters, man. I don't use women. Never have, never will.

Try and fail. I wouldn't even call the results mixed.

Even with the drawn out introduction to how she came to work in this profession, this entire article reads like it was written by someone who despises the people she covers, and one can't help but wonder why she continues to do it?

Someone help me understand. An aggressive journalist publicly doxxes the sordid details of an executive, and he simply suggests doing the same to her—but he is unprofessional, whereas she is the height of professionalism?

Of course, her "male counterpart" being the inimitable Tommy Lee Jones, an actor who's been working as such since 4 years before she was born, would have nothing to do with the financial disparity, would it?

It's a pretty simple answer: a troll.

Women blame other women for relationships that tank. There are no men in that equation. I submit the source story here as anecdotal evidence of this fact.

Somebody might have told him, but he's entitled to his poor taste.

Literally everything you do that gets enough attention on the internet will get you "death threats." Develop a video game? Death threats. Release an album? Death threats. Write an article for a site with hundreds of thousands of pageviews daily? Death threats.

"But it's fine. With an all-male masthead, I'm sure the Post's editorial sidewill continue to be as sensitive and responsive as it's always been to the needs and concerns of its female staffers and readers."

You just used a sexist term ("dick") to deride someone for behavior you can't even begin to substantiate based on the most specious claims available. Well done.