yeah too bad they haven't shipped one yet. vestas shipped 4000MW of turbines in 2010.
yeah too bad they haven't shipped one yet. vestas shipped 4000MW of turbines in 2010.
if they're airless runflats they're fine... there's more than one way to armor a wheel.
those batteries cost more than $50 just a primary cells.
That's the shelf life. it may have a high energy density, but... it contains metallic lithium, it's toxic, it's explosive, and it's a class 9 hazmat shipment. so probably you don't want it, unless you like single use exploding laptops.
It's kind of hard to fly a stern conversion intercept in your quarter billion dollar fighter jet when charlie has no air assets that it wants to lose. modern airplane made for a war we fought 50 years ago.
FADEC means what's input via the throttle control is somewhat arbitrary anyway
Who's on first, what's on second, I don't know is playing shortstop.
If you look at their retarded disclosure the second reported attack came before the first one...
not existing is a really good reason to not have leadership
visit lagos nigeria, take a private cab, get back to us on that...
SF taxis companies run some mix of Vics, Prii, ford escape hybrids and nissans
plenty of diesels that work just fine in luxo-barges. just not GM sourced.
How about illuminated halos around hid headlamps?
if your argument was you're safer in the 5000LB truck then I think you can run the numbers an conclude otherwise...
the beam that extends to the front bumper is really doing the work... in a conventional auto you don't really want the enigne sitting in your lap in an impact so generally when crushing it needs to compress under the safety cell.