Same. I shop at both a Wegman’s and a Shop-Rite and neither have ever carried it. Since hearing of it’s existence, I’ve also checked out our local Target and it’s not there either. I see Amazon has it, but I ain’t paying $10+ for it. 

I would try their choco covered peanuts, but my go-to AMC sweet is Sour Patch Kids or Sour Patch Watermelons. If they come anywhere close to a sour chew that’s like the Sour Patch candies, I would give them a try. Has to be better than Trolli Worms too, those are good, but doesn’t really satisfy the sour part for me.

Craziest Pokemon gym leader yet. That her name is Ida Reams, is just icing on the cake.

Does anyone know if the story in the DLC is considered “essential”? I don’t generally like roguelikes and am kinda peeved story content is tied to it, but if it is, I guess I have to give it a whirl.

That was definitely a thing back in the day. While I didn’t have one myself, I was working at Best Buy when they were still being sold. I believe Sony had a 50+ disc changer that let you swap out discs while one was playing. Had a jukebox-like carousel that was front accessible.

What I hope happens, is that she does get hired, but is fired after completing 59 days, due to poor service, and has to serve her full jail sentence as a result.

Because I was saying, generally all movies deserve preservation. Not just Suicide Squad specifically. Like the line shouldn’t be drawn at “well, I think this one movie sucks, so therefore it deserves to be buried”. That’s a dangerous precedent that studios are more than happy to comply with and notorious for doing…

Florida will keep on Florida-ing.

It’s not a “draft cut”. There was one cut, one that Ayer supervised. WB took all that away from him, got the marketing team that cut the trailer to recut and reshoot(yes, reshoot new scenes) based on the positive reaction to the trailer and their fear of another BvS reception.

I guess we won’t know unless it’s released, correct?

People saying the movie released are saying Suicide Squad has been released. Yes, it has. However, Suicide Squad: Ayer’s Cut hasn’t. It just feels like people arguing for arguments sake there. Two completely different products.

Movie preservation. Pure and simple. Are you familiar with what happened on Terry Gilliam’s Brazil? Terry Gilliam won that fight and his cut got released. Now, did the studio’s “Love Conquers All” cut get buried? It did, until Criterion added it as a supplement to their release.

Yes, movies get workprints, even multiple, but regarding final cut, that’s a broad generalization. Not true of every movie, not even true of all studio films(see Kubrick, Cameron, Tarantino, Coen Bros, etc).

Without a doubt, but he’s not the sell here. Ayer’s cut is, and if they want to bank on celebrity to sell it, Robbie is arguably at the biggest point of her career after Barbie.

Ayer’s cut was not. What is hard to understand about this?

Exactly! Not that this is a smoking gun, type of case, but testimony from the strangers could definitely frame that situation that would benefit either side. Also anyone that was at that party she was taken to, come to think of it.

When she finally got out of the vehicle, she left with strangers who promised to help get her a ride. She went with them to a birthday party, where she had some shots and bought her helpers champagne (per The Daily Beast).

Oh without a doubt, in fact it’s probably due more to residuals and who gets paid for what gets released more than anything as the reason for why they won’t release it.

I don’t know for sure, maybe that’s what Ayer is alluding to. He has shared stills of scenes not in the theatrical and has made mention of very little work needed to be done to release his cut.

Not saying they are entitled to it. Doesn’t mean they can’t be granted it. Like I said, do I care if Suicide Squad Director’s Cut, gets released? No, in fact, I probably won’t watch it, if it does.