Just because I wanted you to be able to read my reply to humz - ha:

I’m with YOU on this - what is more scathing? What could POSSIBLY be more scathing than the car - effectively - reviewing itself via self immolation?

Here’s a thought:

agreed but tactics evolve and when fear wanes vis-a-vie one tactic, a new tactic will often replace it.

While I disagree with your personal speculation (I think the “dispute” was the pretense for a Jihadist Terror act) I agree there is too much speculation and not enough “let’s get the facts first”.

your FIRST reply to this article was “that doesn’t seem to have been their motive at all. did you read the article?”.

Did you even read your own words?

except:

FACTS:

except:

except:

except:

it isn’t dangerous. Not at all. You assume all possible motives then eliminate them as the facts dictate.

depends upon the religion...

I’m assuming you are being sarcastic here but, on the off chance you aren’t...are you SERIOUS?

HA! This article was so great I actually PRINTED it.

and spatial relations, e.g. how much pie fills the space

I get your point but you sort of made it using a false either or paradigm.

I’m moving to Montana. Gunna be a dental floss tycoon.

I didn’t think this was very good because it is a concept - respond with dialogue from (something - a play/book/tv show/comedy routine/movie...whatever) that has been done many times before in various ways - and this wasn’t very well executed.