Call me when your region has more...

Well, it was actually 1 yard and a minute to go....big difference when the opposing QB is Tom Brady.

It's hilarious how Seattle fans flat out believed that GB didn't choke that game away with boneheaded last minute calls, that instead it was Seattle's "tenacious defense" that won it. Now here they are today saying that it was only their one boneheaded last minute play that was the reason they lost....not giving up 4…

If they scored there was still a minute left and that is PLENTY of time for Brady. The guy had 4 TDs and 327 yards against "the best defense in the league", and really only one of those INTs was on him as he was being rushed and threw it away.

Per NFL.com:

Our offense was great last night and held Lynch to 100 yards.

No, as I stated Brady has dominated those teams in the AFC North so why would it matter? If he struggled then you would have a point.

I was referring to the Patriots, although the 2007 was good which I was mistaken about.

My bad, was thinking 2008 team.

You...get ready for work, those fries aren't gonna cook themselves. Living the dream!

Oh, so now it went from "housing 60% less" to "raising your kids around less assholes". So I'm assuming your wife got custody?

I'll say food services, because you sure as fuck wouldn't leave NYC as a hedge fund manager pretending to make more money elsewhere. But you keep telling yourself that, now get to work, HAHAHA!!!

There is absolutely NOTHING better about Chicago over NY, nothing.People don't aspire to live there, pursue dreams or become successful, only in NY.

Who the fuck said I was looking for work, didn't the whole "You work for a living" give you a hint as to my current status, or maybe "making my money work for me" give it away? Plenty of guys on Wall Street that have cashed out early to truly enjoy life. Do you even know what a decent fund manager can make yearly?…

No, that's NOT my reasoning. I already stated it was based on the sheer cost of starting a pro team and reluctance by taxpayers to foot the entire bill. Thus you are left with FANS to support said team, and those same FANS contribute heavily to their finances and ability to gather more talent. As I stated before,…

True, but I think they were ranked near the very bottom, hence this article. The difference with gronk is that he is also a great blocker unlike most if not all other TEs. So teams that normally get at the passer struggle when Gronk sits back to block. Plus he's hard to get off his route, the only way to stop him is…

Seattle lost 4 games this year btw, just like New England. Secondly, the Broncos struggled last postseason leading up to that SB, so that is no indication of how "good" Seattle was, not to mention Seattle didn't improve over last season's team. Now add in having trouble putting away the 7-9 Panthers who hung around…

Fine, what TEs of Gronk's level of greatness have they faced over the past 10 games?

Because comparisons aren't simply made by looking at stats, there are things called variables. If NOTHING changed at all be it the rules, the equipment, the size of players then your point would be valid. But they're not so your's isn't.

...that struggled to put away the 7-9 Panthers and allowed the Packers to self-immolate with minutes left. Seahawks are great, but their entire second half was against backup or injured QBs, save for the Niners who basically imploded the second half. I expect a great game, but nothing near the Broncos last SB.