Even at £100K this is a really good deal but considering they sell in the States for $80,000, I have come to the conclusion of: Fuck this car and Corvettes in general. The Mustang doesn't get a ridiculous price bump why do GM cars huh?

I'd like to see the 6.2 available in something other than the top trim. No dice so far.

Don't forget the price bump to get the diesel in the Ram. $5-$6k, I believe. (Correct me if I'm wrong) We currently have a 2014 Chevy Silverado LTZ, Crew Cab, 6.2L 6.5 ft bed with the big axle, and if the wind blows at all, our 4500 lb camper whips it all over the road. Plus the bonus of 9mpg. Rockin' 14 with no…

Motor trend tested M4 at 3.8. Bmw claims 3.9. What's so funny?

Only problem is that it looks like it was designed by 8 different people who never actually met each other until GM signed off on it.

New GM? Yeah, some kid with nothing to lose making waves isn't the same as a father of 5 with 25 years in. I don't think this illustrates evidence of any change. Excellent PR stunt though.

Ah, Ford... technology for the sake of technology.

3 series fighter is a good idea, the problem with that is now your fighting a 3 series.

Just like GMs COPO drag race only Camaro that uses the Ford 9 inch rear end?

and top dog "insert any auto manufacturer here" uses Dodge Hemispherical design heads. It wouldn't make sense to purposefully not use future tech just because a rival thought it up

That's like saying the 2nd person to use a conventional shock/spring layout was wrong. Just because someone else pioneered it doesn't meant it shouldn't be used. Ferrari seems to agree.

Delphi developed it for GM. Chevy received it from their parent company, they developed nothing (not to mention Cadillac was first to use it (and I know it seems like common sense to point out the Cadillac is a holding of GM Corp and not owned by Chevy, but to the average Chevy fan all of this is hard to grasp…

And how long has GM been using Ford developed mass production?

The Z/28 is 505 HP and weighs 3,800 pounds.

no. it uses microphones to monitor in-cabin powertrain noise, then uses the speakers to suppress the crappier sounding parts and enhance the better sounding bits. It's "tailoring" the sound of the engine, not inventing a whole new one.

Because some people live in areas where AWD is a necessity during parts of the year. That's like asking someone in Florida "Why do you need AC in your car? That just adds weight."

4th: I think this bit from the quoted Detroit News article is easy to miss but says something very important:

The problem is that GM completely misses the point of the luxury car market they're in. The reason Cadillac fails is the same reason that Ferrari succeeds; there are things about German cars that aren't quantifiable that set them apart. A BMW's engine might feel that much more special, a Mercedes might have that much…

The C7 is a great car. Otherwise, there's nothing in the GM portfolio that can't be bettered via another marque.

You can do stunts in a 1978 Mercury Zephry too. Doesn't mean there is a reason to drive one. Harley's suck at pretty much everything but making obnoxious noise and giving you lots of reasons to be a mechanic.

And this video is false advertising. 95% of the chicks popping their tops at Sturgis look like that older woman…