Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    jmpesq--disqus
    JMP
    jmpesq--disqus

    It's not an attack on your character when it's true. You're defending Charles Murray, that makes you very, very racist.

    They're both giant racists, and I would never dignify their hyper-racist shit by reading their books.

    Suggesting I read "The Bell Curve" cover to cover, really? What's next, insisting that I read "Mein Kampf"? No, I'm not reading a white supremacist piece of trash.

    I do not need knowed subject-verb agreement.

    I also know how to use a shift key!

    Toasterlad certainly sounds more intelligent than you, not that that takes much.

    Good job proving that you are a complete racist troll who can't be taken seriously, not that it wasn't obvious. You're defending a hardcore racist whose entire career is claiming that black people are naturally intellectually inferior to white people. He is as racist as they come. He has been maligned fairly.

    Look, it's the incorrect use of "ad hominem attack", which is a favorite of idiot right-wing trolls everywhere! I've almost got bingo!

    Then why are still supporting Donald Trump?

    "Totalitarian impulse of the left", really, even though authoritarianism is a right-wing ideology, and one that this troll is defending.

    Someone who calls all Islam - not just certain fundamentalist sects, not just the theocratic governments of certain countries, but the entire religion of 1.5 billion people worldwide - as equivalent to Nazis, who says of the entire religion "violence is inherent in Islam – it's a destructive, nihilistic cult of death.

    And they're usually right-wing bigots playing the "opponents of racism are THE REAL RACISTS" game.

    Either they're racist, or they're perfectly OK with having a racist a racist as President.

    They are well respected - except by white supremacists like you - they are not a hate group, that is utterly ridiculous, and they don't slander people. You are just a liar.

    No, it's not intellectually dishonest at all. It doesn't label people bigots unless they are actually bigots.

    Aayan Hirsi Ali, the severe Islamaphobe infamous for promoting hatred of all Muslims., you mean?

    Dude, the very article you listed actually was attacking the eminently respected civil rights group, the Southern Poverty Law Center. Only hardcore white supremacists attack the SPLC; this proves that they are not mainstream.

    "but I have intellect and reason"

    Where does the rule that you can "win" by declaring yourself victor come from, anyway? So many internet trolls seem to think that's how debate works.

    No they fucking aren't.