jlksjdlfjsdosodiuosidufos
Cabbage Patch Mather
jlksjdlfjsdosodiuosidufos

She is 48, probably about 80 lbs overweight and hasn’t had sex in about 15 years, I think. Maybe longer — could be more like 20.

I wish you could talk to a friend of mine who is also a fat lady and who HERSELF feels that any man who would be interested in her would be some kind of fucked-up fat fetishist who is only using her to get his chub-loving rocks off.

Ah yes, the old “I’m going to talk about sex like it’s so violent that I will murder/main you horribly” routine.

No one doubts the ability of a woman to get laid. Size is irrelevant, anyone who has glanced at the internet can confirm. Women can get laid. Not a problem we are having...

The argument is that hotties won’t be seen in public with fatties, not that they won’t fuck them

Honey, get some help. You’ve got a serious case of warped world-view. I’m sorry if it’s from your personal experience.

Look, if you’ve had problems with men, go see a therapist. Or a priest. Or bitch to a friend. But you’re painting all men with the same brush, which is just about the same as what trumpie’s doing.

I’m just thinking - AS A WOMAN - how fucked up your hostility is. “Third wave feminism”? Really?

You miss the point. The point is saying “oh boys will be boys!” means that there is that rape, sexual assault, aggressiveness, and power over women is some natural state of being for all men, when the majority of men, like the OP, do not use that kind of language and do not boil down remarks like Trump’s to be some

Oh I see, you are latching onto the idea that something isn’t “misandrist” unless it harms men, rather than just insults them. Well clearly the above commenter meant it to mean “insulting to men”, but if you must look for actual harm, how about this:

You seem to be responding to a non-existent comment. This comment isn’t about Trump sexually assaulting women. It specifically addresses those defending Trump’s words as “boy’s talk,” which is an appropriate topic given that the article is about Melania’s interview in which she...defends what Trump said as “boy’s

Thank you. We all know that Trump doesn’t represent “all guys” or “all locker room talk” but his claims that it does are upsetting (to put it mildly). In the wake of this news, I’ve taken solace in the huge numbers of men who have come forward to refute Trump’s assertion that this is just how the men are when women

The original poster just shared his story of how actual “locker room” talk is. I’m male, have a mother I adore and sisters. I grew up pretty much outnumbered by gender so never really looked at such talk among males when they are with their friends which usually involved objectifying good looking women (porn stars,

Yeah man. I can tell you when I was in college. Sex sex sex was all we tried to get every weekend it was hit on girls at the bar. Throw parties to try and get laid. I will tell you never in public or in private did anyone ever say they would grab a woman by force. You don’t do that shit and you definitely don’t

Oh, FFS. If you’re trolling, then you’re quite good at it. If you’re not, re-evaluate how you spend your time.

I think we can admit this is damaging to both sexes in different ways

Oh, shut the fuck up, already, troll.

No, but there can be more than one casualty in a war. It doesn’t feel like Wandering Scout was trying to change the target, and make men “the real victims” of Trump’s words, but rather that he was trying hard to point out that Trump doesn’t speak for all men. Trump speaks in absolutes, (“you always see...” “you never

this guy thinks that not talking about raping female porn stars (you know, those lesser women) is the pinnacle of good behavior.

IKR? This election is seriously the fucking worst. It’s like civil discussion across ideologies went completely by the wayside, even for stuff as non-hot-button as economics and tax policy.