It’s massively concern trollish, too. I’m pretty sure adults can decide on their own whether or not they want to take the stairs.

Hmm. First, okay, but what if you need to check and see if you have food in your teeth or you need to get an eyelash out of your eye?

Right on.

First, LOTS of people should be filing suit against the state. Everyone that can’t get their license from her needs to immediately file a nice, fat suit for lots and lots of money.

Name-calling is the last line of poor critical thinking, really. Look in the mirror. You’re the fucking moron for buying the latest fake “scandal.”

It’s simple. They need to revise that law. Make it optional and have “Open Donors” and “closed donors.”

So, he’s threatening to cut an enormous fart?

I’m not firmly entrenched in any party. I am a progressive. You’re a libertarian, I bet. They always claim to liberal. But, you know, haha. no.

Conservative .com are not reliable sources.

You don’t get it, eh? Here’s the deal. If it wasn’t illegal, or against policy, when she did it, there’s nothing to be done, as she wasn’t doing anything wrong. It would be like arresting someone for using cocaine or marijuana BEFORE they became illegal.

::eyeroll:: Since it was never illegal when she did and completely common practice, only having a policy against it after she left, I’m fine with it. Since NOTHING WRONG ACTUALLY OCCURRED. How in the world can I insult the intelligence of someone who wants to prosecute for “future” crimes?

No. You are making a comparison between illegal drugs and a policy change that happened AFTER Clinton left office.

I like H & M, but don’t live near a store. When I order, the sizing is really hard to get right.

No. One, the drug, is against the law.

These people are complete idiots.

Lordy. Thank you. This people are dimwits. And the press is really being irresponsible.

She didn’t lie about anything. When they asked, she turned them over. It was a common practice that changed after she left office. Nothing is happening here except everyone is trying to pretend something happened.

No. Again, the minute the policy was changed, they asked for them, and she handed them over.

It doesn’t matter. If it wasn’t classified, it wasn’t a problem.

1. No. Stop that. Is this what they’re using as possible armchair beliefs somewhere? ::eyeroll::