Pointing out the omission of this point isn’t the “gotcha!” you and some others here seem to think it is, considering that point is extremely critical of virtually every main aspect of NFTs and the people using them as they currently exist. It is at most defending the hypothetical concept of an NFT, but has nothing…

Seems pretty rich to accuse somebody of crafting a “narrative” on that basis.

I’m not the person you replied to, but as I see it, complaining about “the narrative” is almost universally used to mean “I can’t say you’re wrong about anything, but I don’t like the implications of those true facts”.

The only narrative possible is “Thing X Very Bad/Thing X Very Good” It’s very sad. There’s a lot to be discussed about NFTs and the blockchain, and the fact that this nation’s press mostly consists of low-effort blogs like this, most people are completely missing out and trapped in only the culture war aspect of it. 

Is there any reason why you seemed to willfully disregard the artist’s actual point, mentioned in the gist you linked to?

thanks for reading

::reads title::

Sounds like a fun guy to have at a party. Aren’t these types of tropes what drive most stories? A princess gets kidnapped, there is a nuke in some city, there is a spy infiltrating something secret, someone was murdered, something was stolen.

This seems like a such a weird thing to get upset about. Browser has been kidnapping Peach since the 80s.