jjschmidt
JJSchmidt
jjschmidt

What does it mean? If you turn off your feminist bias for a moment and think, you might realize that since International Men’s Day doesn’t receive any attention at all, many are still wondering if it exists.

But no, even though you don’t know the motive of those people googling for International Men’s Day, it doesn’t

Certainly. Gizmodo in this and other articles has repeatedly accused Donald Trump of being a nazi sympathizer when you know that, in his press conference last Tuesday, he condemned the nazis, white supremacists, and the alt-right. EVERYONE has condemned the white supremacists except the supremacists themselves.

Ok, so

Now you’re a bunch of masked cowards committing random violence, attacking those you disagree with, and spitting on capitalism and the Constitution. Please don’t compare yourselves with the military. You really have nothing in common with them.

Its quite obvious Gizmodo is pushing liberal politics. They are so heavily slanted it is not even funny.

Gizmodo is now a fake news libtard network.

Yeah. No woman would ever be interested in a superhero movie.

If there were men only screenings for say... Ironman or Superman movies,would you say the same? I’m guessing not.

destroy all women? i’m browsing the subreddit right now and i see nothing about destroying women. are you referring to destroying the social structure in place to favor women? then sure, we are all for destroying getting screwed in divorce, having trash people only be men and for false rape accusations to go down.

when it comes to college campuses today, absolutely. look at the recent events at Portland State University. instead of allowing the trump supporters to gather and rally for their candidate, the students at PSU chose to violently disrupt the rally, including telling people that the supporter’s addresses and all that

you can’t use logic here. this is a “safe space” where emotion reigns supreme. it makes no sense to tell the readers to read beyond the first post in the subreddit because that would mean their opinions based on the rest of the subreddit might not run in line with the author’s. can’t have that, can we?

it is male socialization, or at least, the type that occurred before political correctness ran rampant in the world. TRP provides a place where men can speak without fear of getting silenced. the topics discussed are unfit for those with soft hearted feelings. they are raw and unfiltered takes on an unjust world.

I kinda hate to say it, but some of what they said makes sense (I’m only reading from this article, I don’t use Reddit).

Does telling someone to shut up on the internet ever actually get someone to shut up? I would think by now you would have gathered that it doean’t. Or are you a bit delayed?

There are a number of fatherhood activist groups and I assume some of them would accept being referred to as Men’s Rights Activists. And tons of hate groups donate to or run charities. So basically nice “no true Scottsman” fallacy.

I didn’t even remember that conversation tbh. But yeah I guess you’re the kind of person who can’t handle people pointing out that you are wrong. Gosh, your life must just be awful. :p

? Nope. Just pointing out the inherent inaccuracies of your comment.

MRAs actually aren’t since they aren’t a single group (I.e. skin heads aren’t a hate group but skin head groups are) regardless of anything else (I.e. vagueness in what MRA means depending on who is defining it).

You know, I’m tired of the misandry masquerading as feminism.

So shouldn’t they have an obligation to not promote subreddits that engage in transphobia and misogyny?