Why not just offer an adjustable rear seat? Slide the rear seat forward if/when more luggage space is needed?
Why not just offer an adjustable rear seat? Slide the rear seat forward if/when more luggage space is needed?
. . . or have a wheelbarrow or lawn mower sticking out the back, with a bungee cord holding the hatch down . . .
Son of Element?
I had an ‘83 with a gutless 4-cylinder “Iron Duke” in it. When the 4-speed crapped out, my mechanic found a used 5-speed to throw in. It’s the only vehicle I’ve ever driven where you’d lose speed in 5th, even on the flats, so it never got used!
Another (remote) possibility is that this could’ve been a fleet car. The City & County of Denver had quite a few of these, back in the day, in this color.
There’s always the Dome in St Louis, where the Rams used to play . . .
I hope they added a Lo-Jack, as well . . .
It’s probably some sort of specialized cutting fluid. When I worked in a factory with mechanized cutting tools, similar stuff was used to prolong the life of the bits doing the heavy work.
See “Honda Ridgeline” for the NA version . . .
Good to see the next step happening - the proof will be in how it actually works, out in the real world.
Damn . . . that’s both fugly and stupid! Bring back the stepside because you can’t see into the bed?!
Oversteer . . . but I had a great teacher, a ‘65 Corvair . . .
I had a Gremlin. I ended up getting a clear plastic fresnel lense to stick inside the back window. It helped.
And that’s my point. In this case, I don’t have much of a concern, but there have been too many other examples of forfeitures done on some pretty shaky pretenses. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/12/1/16686014/phillip-parhamovich-civil-forfeiture
Asset forfeiture prior to conviction is a pretty shaky legal theory. Whatever happened to “innocent until proven guilty”?