Evidence of what? Shit designs like protected bicycle lanes that are hidden by parked cars or where buses unload into the bicycle lanes? Shit designs like bi-directional bike lanes on one side of the street? Go look them up.

Shadowy figures? Who stated anything about shadowy figures? The political groups exist, the movement exists. You know it exists yet you ridicule it as being something on the order of HARRP telling people their cat is going to murder them. What that says is you would prefer that the masses not know about it. You want…

just a word of note, if there’s one electric car that’s more crony capitalist than Muskmobiles it’s the Nissan Leaf. I haven’t tallied the score recently but the leaf got a lot of support from government.

That explains it. Q-jets are complicated, especially before the computer control. I bought a book on qjets, read it, and then used it as my guide. Without it the instructions in the kit would have been misleading. A extra $15 as a 17 year for the book would have been out of the question, but I was older and $15 was…

“but why is this a jalopnik thing?”

I have had no issues with Qjets. The computerized one I rebuilt suffered from the usual maladies of age and grime and once cleaned and rebuilt worked flawlessly.

I know. But when I say so directly on the more traveled branches of gawker media a shit storm erupts so I have to be less direct.

It’s even better with three on the tree.

You lost. You have presented no argument. You have done little more than fling insults. What little more you did admitted to the premise of social engineering and was simply repeating what other people told you. You have demonstrated no ability to debate, think, or otherwise demonstrate any useful intelligence beyond…

Unlike what you’re flinging, it’s not an insult. It’s an accurate description. You repeat what you are told without understanding it. It’s better to be a useful idiot is another fact. Nobody holds anything against the useful idiot. He isn’t socially maligned for it either. Once again you fail.

Better to be a useful idiot like you.

It’s quite clear you require repetition. And furthermore you clearly didn’t understand what you typed and its implications. You just like sounding “smart” by repeating what others tell you. The idea of controlling the number of trips is social engineering. Engineering for society is making the number and kind of trips…

What you wrote is very clear. You have decided that the overhead bus is bad because it leaves the number of possible driving trips alone. The overhead bus if successful is useful transit that does not adversely impact other modes. It’s a win-win from functional engineering perspective. You are attacking it from a…

It’s amazing how you can admit social engineering is the basis of your objection to overhead buses (because it doesn’t make driving worse) and then ridicule the concept in the next breath.

That piece, that five garden hose fitting, makes the arguments against using the hydrant moot. It reduces the flow and what you have is the same as what comes out of the pipe in any of the homes or businesses on that block. Back pressure is maintained so there is no hammering from too quick a shut off or opening of…

nm

For a few hours there’s likely no need for filters and chlorine.

Differential pressure. Any water that gets past the liner on to the dumpster surfaces won’t likely make it back to the “swimming” side of the liner. The pressure of the water on the liner will keep it going on it’s journey out of the dumpster. Now stepping in the water on the street in bare feet.... well now there’s…

I forgot to mention, that SF flim was taken on a saturday.

You wrote it yourself: