nm

1) you didn’t understand it.

Now now such guidelines don’t exist, it’s just another conspiracy theory. Writers don’t go out of their way to label their political opponents nazis or anything.... oh.... the article above:
“It should probably be noted, however, that the two political identities overlap in virtually every way.”

That’s all you can come up with after three weeks to think about it?

C&D would call the pushrod 302 a 4.9L through the 80s and 90s. I guess they wanted to avoid that.

deleted.

The Pittsburgh Press – Sep 15, 1969_

You're probably correct about texting. Getting killed by a texting driver seems fairly rare. Motorcyclists seem to get killed most often by the pulled out into traffic and didn't look drivers.

The initial I saw you texting attempt at confrontation? That’s strange and very playing-cop like.
Confronting her after nearly being hit? Perfectly acceptable.
The I’m going to the cops stuff? Very tattle-tale child like.

The problem is nobody is really offering al-carte channels. Instead of paying for package of a 120 channels to get the 6 you watch you have to pay for 6 packages of 20 channels to get the six you watch.

Since Jalopnik has been putting my comments into super-grey where they don’t even show up when showing pending it’s unlikely anyone will see this, but I’ll write it anyway.

“Been saying this from day one. People knew, lied, and covered shit up... to save a buck. And people died.”

“GM was hardly the only automaker who prioritized price over safety.”

This old, tired, and almost always manufactured narrative smells of Ralph Nader and Joan Claybrook. Reading on....

We have this problem at traffic lights because americans are being deliberately mistaught how to drive. They are taught to wait 2 or 3 seconds after the car in front of them moves on. I’ve seen this in multiple driver safety courses.

Because the people who control what is taught about driving will also govern the laws…

You’re reduced to declarations, assertions, and insults. That’s not logic, debate, or evidence. This is how you must defend your fallacy.

In terms of economics the major parties have been running fascists since the 1930s. As far as cults of personality and goose stepping not so much.

Keep dancing. You just keep dancing and making assertions backed up with other people’s assertions that they know how to spend our wealth better than we do. That’s all your cite does, assert it using the same faulty logic that government spending is good spending and people spending their own wealth is bad spending.…

I’ve supported my claim. It is the broken window falacy by definition, as defined in the original text. One which you obviously neglected to read in full. Any multiplier effect is irrelevant for the unseen also has a multiplier effect.

You continue to willfully ignore the point. I will spoon feed it to you slower:

Where is your evidence that all these great inventions that come through the US military would not have occurred otherwise? You obviously accept they have market use and demand so why would they not be created by the free market in some…

You’re a real piece of work. Save the psychological bullshit for someone else.