That’s what I assumed. The track of CJ-5 makes for one big rib cage.

I used to impress girls in high school by having my friend drive the front two wheels of his Jeep CJ-5 onto my chest in a ramp-type configuration.

She had the word “might” in the very passage you quoted. That makes clearly labeled as conjecture. When you respond with the tone that you did, calling it out as conjecture, it comes across as you saying her conjecture is absurd. But it’s only in tone at that point. So I state my experience. Without any remarks. You…

Would you like to find the bit where I claimed I had never seen it or claimed it doesn’t happen?

You claimed you had never seen it, someone just drive off as soon as they could. I’ve seen it. Four times. No apologies. No words. Just drove off. My anecodote counteracts the claim you derived from yours. It does happen, people do just drive off. Ordinary normal people. Now I wasn’t hurt and maybe if I was visibly…

Skater did it wrong... probably because it was the honk that angered him. But if he fell on the hood and it got badly scratched as he slid down the slope..... it’s just part of the “accident”.

I’ve been hit in crosswalks/driveway crossings four times in my life. Three at a parkinglot driveway where a traffic light has since been installed. In every instance they drove off without saying a word. Even the one that knocked me down. I even followed him to the next store across the street. Not a f’ing word.…

Need to find a shister of a lawyer with quack doctor for civil. For criminal the cops have a no-blood-no-foul rule for merely stupid drivers or things where intent can be masked by stupidity. It has to be clearly intentional. In the instance where I went after the driver (in a bicycling situation) criminally he put…

No cop is going to come out and write those tickets for a mere ‘stupid driver’ move like that. The driver has to do something clearly intentional for them to be interested.

“The EU is constantly expanding, constantly adding more laws that take precedence over the member nation’s laws.”

“your problem is with soverignty.”

Product standards started with independent bodies. When government saw an opportunity to expand its power it took over quite a few of them, but many such independent standards still dominate in various industries. They work quite well and a far sight better than those created by governance. Of course you wouldn’t have…

Detriment of one country? Trade is mutually beneficial or people don’t trade. What you mean it is that it may be to the deteriment of one government and its friends.

The EU is constantly expanding, constantly adding more laws that take precedence over the member nation’s laws. If you don’t understand how trade effects your life, how taxes effect your life, how prices effect your life, how increasing leverage of dictating the terms of trade into other areas effects your life, how…

Yes you’re against brexit and you’ve decided I’m for it and you want to argue the merits of brexit. Completely ignoring what I actually write.You have taken both sides of the discussion. You are arguing with strawmen of your own creation.

Present an argument that is sound on it’s own merits and doesn’t rely on it coming from the media or some other authority, and then you might be “right”. Until then you’re just repeating what teacher told you and not thinking and thus will in most cases, be wrong.

I am simply noting the fact of the behavior is being used in place of debate.

See, here you go again, after repeated correction you’ve decided what arguments I need to defend. I’ll assign you one to defend. Tell me why you think George W. Bush is a lizard alien. I want proof.

You wouldn’t know a troll or a sociopath if one bit you in ass turtle face. Furthermore logic is something foreign to you as well.

What is dishonest is that you have taken both sides of the discussion. You make up arguments for me that you can knock down. I warned you of your bad behavior and kept the discussion going. You continued that same behavior. When I refused to participate further you decided that you could then demand answers to…