“Only 15 women between ages 19 and 28 were interviewed, which is pretty skimpy.”

Also known as not a sufficient sample size to make any type of conclusion.

Oh, and "bad sex" isn't rape.

No, no. You are right. She's creepy as fuck.

You do know these things are networked together, right?

You probably should have stuck with “Man makes sweeping generalization and the internets rushed to prove him right, ruining his career and putting the life of his bandmates’ families in danger."

“It’s a beautiful, lonely, humiliating idea that we all fucking deserve.”

Jesus fuck. What the fuck is wrong with this writing staff? Every last one of you hates your readers and writes stupid shit like this....

We hold our phones together like boys in the locker room and compare sizes.

You know I wasn't, but after reading this line of shit I think you've just changed my mind!

I don’t understand this expectation for things to change. You lived with him before you married him, you know exactly what it’s going to be like after you marry him. Why the fuck do you expect things to change once you marry him?

Did you say no? Did you change your mind before she engaged? Did she engage any ways? You were raped. Her inducing your penis into erection does not constitute a "yes". She raped you. Even if you liked it.

It’s rape. You told him no, never changed your mind and told him yes. “No means no.” That’s the end. All men need continuous positive permission through out the entire act for it not to be rape. Did she say no? It’s rape. Did she say yes and while your penis was inside her, she said no, and your penis didn't…

She can most definitely sue Dr. Luke for raping her.

Man, there you go talking sense and stuff! You know that's just gonna get you banned!

Maybe they should have started with sueing Dr. Luke for raping her....

At least in Illinois, if you failed to show up for court when a creditor sued you...

That's not what she was doing, she was trying to break the contract. She should have sued him for raping her, then it would be "more likely than not" instead it's "what does him raping you have to do with your contract with him?"

No more a liar than any other accuser. Evidence is what we base our convictions on.

As far as I know he hasn’t been convicted of raping her, which would make it hard for it to constitute force majeure. Currently it’s merely an accusation that doesn’t have a bearing on a contract. First, she gets him convicted of raping her, then she sues him for raping her in the amount of several billion dollars,…

At the time she was a doctor and professor for Tennessee. She was his superior. Sexual harassment law is written to protect people from being sexually harassed by their superiors, that's probably why it got casually dismissed.

That's not true, both Chad and UAB have higher base rates and you conveniently disregard the massive tax breaks we give to corporations.

“Revisionist” ????