jimmyjet
jimmyjet
jimmyjet

“Aspirational Shopper” - is that an industry term? Because that really explains why people buy stupid shit like Ferrari apparel. Nothing says “I don’t own a Ferrari” quite like an obnoxious prancing arabian polo shirt.

The Bloomberg article on this was astounding. This was greed from the top, plain and simple. I understand the thought exercise of finding a less expensive way to make the same product to boost income, but the propellant they selected should have been rejected the moment their engineers said “hey, ammonium nitrate

You gotta love a woman who knows who she is. She’s a woman playing a woman disguised as another woman.

Nothing says, “I don’t own a Ferrari” or “I’m an insufferable tool with a Ferrari” quite like a Ferrari polo.

If Mazda only sent 3000 Miatas stateside when they were first introduced, they might have pulled this off. They made plenty more, but some dealers still tried to mark up over MSRP in 1991 when I bought mine.

Well, that’s one way to sell off the scrap leather. Also:

God help me... I like it.

The man did his homework. The want is STRONG with this one.

Respect!

I’ve been dealing with a similar problem for the better part of a year. I’m in CRM hell because some woman named Audrey filled out an application for a mortgage matching service (like LendingTree, but I don’t know which one) and she or they got the phone number wrong. I now get calls every day even though I’m on the

This! This! Please let this happen.

If it means another GOP ideologue moves from elected seat to the cabinet only to be driven out by Trump, scandal, impeachment or all three, I’m fine with any monster our Dear President deems suitable to replace that elvish popinjay.

Short of being driven from office by being discovered with a live boy or dead girl, this is the best outcome I could hope for - Jeff Sessions removed from power without a chance to get back in until the next election. If he should run in the 2017 special election to get his seat back, he’ll have to answer for enabling

I disagree, but even if you’re right, Subaru decided to make that claim. They tried to penalize her at first by holding her car and demanding payment. Then after some public pressure thought better of it and simply blackballed her from future drivetrain repairs. If Natalie wants to make your argument, she’ll have to

You’re probably not wrong in that regard, but Subaru corporate has a good reputation for follow up on customer sales and service experience. They’re paying the bill on that warranty work and the dealership and/or corporate found an out. Holding her car hostage was a terrible way to handle it, but they relented and, in

Dixon, meanwhile, credited “God for being with him in that Corvette.”

We’re basically in agreement here on the warranty, but “stalking” isn’t what the dealer did. She had her car in for repair multiple times and since Subaru corporate pays the bills, they got involved when they saw the same VIN three times in a short span. In other situations, this would be an opportunity to show good

Your thoughts on Subaru’s warranty vs. Subaru’s legal team.

Just noticed her front air dam is damaged and she’s missing a fog light.

It’s a lot harder for the dealership to prove you were racing without a photo, although that is getting easier now that manufacturers are adding telemetry. She was playing a shell game with Subaru and they caught her. It’s as simple as that.