Are they trying to say that the first amendment is forcing them to serve porn to anyone who wants it? That's fucking absurd. Porn isn't speech, it's indulgence. They make it sound like it's their responsibility to supply people with the fucking luxury of the internet.

They really need to streamline the browsing experience. Like for instance, if you click on a movie or show that's not available, it shows a few movies that may be similar. But it doesn't give you that option if the movie is available. Another thing I wish they would add is the ability to browse by all genres and…

Note: this is also called Gawker Blogs syndrome.

That's just a bunch of lazy-people mumbo-jumbo! Now get to work, hippy!

It's okay, you can buy those separately.

Enough with all this science talk!

But when I listen to the radio, or watch TV, I'm not giving out my personal info. At best I give someone my horrible taste in entertainment.

I don't know how they made Helvetica feel like Arial, but they did.

*Image fail* [www.psu.com]

Numbers is everything boys!

I do it all the time. It works! Totally saves the brakes.

It's like 10 flashing gifs and 1 shitty midi song short of being a GeoCity

You have to take a few surveys to get that kind of info for free.

When you have to take surveys to get free stuff, you are the product being sold.

Throw into first and you slow down quick.

That's reserved for the guys that hang out in the home depot parking lot entrance.

Slavtronic!

Joke?

"Foreman argues that if he were slowing down after being picked up by the sensor, the photos would show his brake lights (which they don't).

You just stop that counting down business. If you count back up, you might still be able to reverse it.