This should start a fight, but I’ll say The Shining. 

I can’t believe this one hasn’t been mentioned more. King probably saw too much of himself in the main character, so he put more of the emphasis on his breakdown on the supernatural. I like Kubrick’s take better, where the supernatural only gives Jack a slight push in the psychotic direction.

It happened decades ago, he served his time, and he moved on. Why is it an issue to be broached now? Unlike most of these fucks, he actually faced public and legal consequences for his actions

Really? 1 was such a drip and typically bland lead protagonist-type. I thought the show improved drastically upon ditching him to focus on 2 and Android.

Freedom of Speech doesn’t protect you from another US Citizen saying “I don’t like the thing you are saying.” It protects you from the government locking you in jail cause you said that thing. The guy who tackled the flag waving racist went to jail and paid a fine. There was no government action against the flag…

I’m not sure I agree with the idea that Chandra has previously been portrayed as competent. She had been portrayed and young and in over her head. Her first big character beat was advising Naz not to take the plea offer, even though they had him dead to rights at that point and the two more experienced defense…