This is US Soccer we’re talking about, so...probably.

I wouldn’t because my answer may inadvertently damage their cause. And since my organization already made a statement  https://ussoccerplayers.com/2019/03/usmnt-statement-on-wnt-players-lawsuit.html I certainly wouldn’t entertain questioning from a novice reporter.

i know this is besides the point but ‘you failed to respond’ is a very entitled way of thinking what someone else should be doing for you with their time and seems very common across the journalism industry.

“status as a blogger for Deadspin probably doesn’t warrant a response”

If my co workers were in a salary litigation I wouldn’t comment either. Also, did you consider your status as a blogger for Deadspin probably doesn’t warrant a response?

Sorry Deadspin, but in the US soccer world, ur only slightly better than TMZ.

If my employer was being sued and a reporter asked me to comment on the thing the lawsuit was about I’d probably avoid talking about it too.

Generally, parties, or non-parties such as the players on the USMNT, are free to discuss civil disputes in progress.

Publication that touts “without access” angle, wants access, doesn’t get access

To be fair, I rarely check my spam folder either.

They may not have a GM but any Wizard worth their salt believes in their staff. 

Funnily enough the twitch ban, even if temp, is WAY more punishment than the law permits. The Californian law that this breaks comes with a max fine of $1000 whereas he loses thousands per day and almost 100 grand if hes out for a month.

I have two kids. I obviously wouldn’t like them filmed in the bathroom. No one disputes that it was very unfortunate for that to have happened. What are you looking for though? You want him to register as a sex offender? Ban him from the internet? OR we could tell him to never do that again and commence making…

Yep in the world of Kayfabe you never break character. He’s not going to apologize and risk his persona over it. 

Weird a level headed comment on these stories. You are brave sir. 

There’s nothing in it for him to apologize. He’d have to break character, and that character made him rich. It’s not like anyone who is outraged by this is going to subscribe if he says he regrets what he did.

He probably started with masturbating in front of small animals.

He clearly was an explosive talent.

I don’t think the issue is of cause-and-effect. It’s the pattern of entitlement and lack of boundaries that suggests a likelihood of carrying on as or more serious invasions elsewhere.

I think that this paper misrepresents our work. We never called Banksy a terrorist. This has been taken out of context and misused. The line from the paper reads: