I enjoy all types of pubic hair styling, but why is removing all pubic hair seen as less feminist/not feminist while removing hair from other parts of the body more than acceptable? I feel like men who prefer less/no pubic hair on women or even women with that preference are viewed as having some pedophilia-esque…

I enjoy all types of pubic hair styling, but why is removing all pubic hair seen as less feminist/not feminist while removing hair from other parts of the body more than acceptable? I feel like men who prefer less/no pubic hair on women or even women with that preference are viewed as having some pedophilia-esque…

The line was 'called out' because his statement involved 'sexiness' and Charney has a reputation for being a creep/perv/etc. There is nothing wrong with what he said though. It's actually great as sexy underwear/lingerie has a very specific image that would be destroyed if people considered where and how it was…

Your bias is showing. No one said anything about force. How about programs educating people about eating health? Or how about subsidizing healthy food? Stop being paranoid; the state is not going to force you to eat broccoli.

Ohhhh, so you're just taking orders?Thanks that clears that up.

I used to love this site. It's terrible now. Dodai has lost all credibility. Writing one sentence? She is no journalist. I don't think she even qualifies as a blogger at this point.

Dodai, you've completely lost all credibility. How is this worth a post? You want commenters to do all the work.

Over the legal limit? I'm not sure what that means. Being drunk isn't illegal. Are you referring to the legal limit to operate a motor vehicle? If so, you are not correct. It's pretty common for people to be way too intoxicated to legally drive to engage in consensual sex.