Well, if you’re not willing to believe that people wouldn’t possibly avoid voicing blatant sexism and would instead rationalize their dislike for the film, maybe you’ll consider that the people you talk to aren’t representative. The YouTube video of the trailer is the most down voted video in YouTube history. Yet, bad…

Well, shit, if those people tell you they don’t care they are women, well, it must be true. Anyone truly sexist would surely come right out and say so when confronted!

Illinois returns the favor with East St. Louis, Illinois. And Missouri one ups everyone, of course, with Kansas City, Missouri. I like to think these names were passive aggressive swipes in border disputes in the early 19th century.

Do you have an argument? Have you ever had an independent thought? Because naming names is not an argument, and is not persuasive.

“attempting to ration”

Eh. Kind of interesting. I’ve never even heard even the most Randian of nut jobs suggest the government is completely unneeded. Dumb as all fuck, but interesting.

Okay. That’s an interesting, untrue argument, but the fact that Consumer Reports exists doesn’t really do anything to prove that point.

Umm....what do you think men do at urinals?

So wait. Because a non-governmental entity does one thing, we don’t need government?

Yep, you nailed it. People who oppose application of the death penalty here have more empathy for Roof than his victims. That is it. We all love a killer more than his victims. That makes a ton of fucking sense, you fucking idiot.

Wow! I’ll be honest - you are trying so, so hard to appear intellectual, failing so, so badly. I mean, I’m sure in your mind, you just wrote the most brilliant death penalty think-piece that has ever been written, but you just wrote about 10,000 words of confused non-sense.

Well, shit, the judge who abused his power by having an attorney handcuffed said she was in contempt of court, so she must have been.

Are you actually asking how it could be just, or was that a rhetorical question? Because it sure seems like you are saying that it is somehow unjust to have a society that doesn’t provide for the state-sanctioned homicide as punishment for crimes. And saying that is at least as “incoherent” as saying a society that…

So are you saying that any justice system where thereis no provision for state sponsored killing is somehow unjust because of that? Because there are many states in this country, and many nations around the world, that would object to your characterization of them as unjust because they refuse to commit homicide as…

If you think it is ever appropriate to seek the death penalty, you don’t really have a firm stance against it.

Pretty much every death penalty case will.

Well, he “usually” puts his gun away when his kids are around. Usually is fine there, not that important to do it every time.

It sickens me that Jezebel would run such a slanted article.

“but it seems like Havard forgot he wasn’t in a wood-paneled basement at the local hunting lodge seeing who could piss against a wall the hardest.”

What does this even mean? When has America rejected Hillary Clinton?