Every article about rape on Jezebel is designed to elicit outrage. I don’t think in every article about rape or sexual assault the author needs to say “Guys, I am pissed about this.” I mean, every rape is horrible, right? I am not accusing Jezebel of being lackluster, I am pointing out that the tone of their coverage…

You are literally posting your comment in an article that is a follow up with new information.

I mean, fine, whatever. You aren’t going to substantively defend your argument. That’s fine. Your argument is wrong though. You said “they didn’t cover it.” That is objectively, factually, false.

Thanks for giving an actual substantive response.

What a weird comment, since you are posting it on a story covering the attacks, and Jezebel has had multiple stories on the attacks.

I mean, I posted links to other articles about rape which don’t include any similar turns of phrase to the one example you cited, and that in fact have similar tones/levels of outrage to this one. You are ignoring them. You have yet to substantively respond to that argument, instead attacking my motivations and using…

Oh, a very cryptic one, you. Yet another post in which you fail to substantively address my arguments, in favor of lame, inconsequential nonsense. If that is all you have to offer, please stop wasting my time.

Because your criticisms of Jezebel are blatantly inaccurate. They don’t have anything to explain to you, except “Ummmm....your characterization is false.” You’ve accused them of not covering this story. They have. You then accused them of having an inappropriate tone because of one sentence in a piece about a…

I mean, this is your tenth comment in reply to me. Are you stalking me? Of course not. All of my other replies have been in one thread where we are having a discussion. I was not aware that replying to defend my arguments constituted “stalking.” And this is an article near the top of Jezebel’s main page. Don’t flatter…

Well, he is being accused of choking someone...

Again, fucking idiot (there), they reported the story at least as early as every other majorglobal media outlet, including conservative ones like Fox News. Each article specifically mentioned that the attackers were of Arab descent.

So one sentence from one piece about a different subject is what makes Jezebel’s coverage insufficient? Got it. Do you actually have anything you can pull from the multiple pieces on Cologne that shows they tip-toed around the issues, or are you just going to hang your hat on the fact that they didn’t recycle a…

They reported the story at least as early as every other major international media outlet (including Fox News).

Weird. They are actually reporting on the story, yet you still find a way to criticize them for having a narrative. Probably because you’re a fucking idiot. No surprise there.

Okay, like everyone else arguing about this, you are moving the goalposts.

Yeah, maybe, but the lack of a story on the Cologne mayor doesn’t further any agenda Jezebel is accused of having. That story has nothing to do with the origins of the attackers.

I mean, Pamela Gellar is a specifically anti-Islam blogger. She is hardly a legitimate worldwide news outlet.

That request would probably draw a lot of blank stares, since Jezebel did cover it.

What about this article, describing “dozens” of sexual assaults perpetrated by a “pack of 1,000 men” is timid? How is this not a follow up?

Five days after the original story, they posted a story about how 500 crimes were committed, the same day the BBC reported on it. And they are doing more reporting on it here. For an outlet trying to run away from the story, reporting on it the same day it broke in the international media, and posting follow ups as…