jeyfree21
Jeyfree
jeyfree21

I haven’t been to a movie theater in over 10 years - hell the last time I can remember was when I was dating my wife. Seriously though, my list is as follows:
1a) The current movies are terrible and not worth watching. I’d rather do some other activity instead.
1b) Recycling old plots into “new” movies with just more

Problems with movies; RANKED!

I think it would be easier if Hollywood would just come clean and be like yeah sorry we made a bunch of shitty movies. But that will never happen. The problem is there isn’t any easy solution, I mean you have actors demanding $20 million a picture, which is fine they can ask for however much they want, but that

The last couple of sentences say it all. Rotten Tomatoes has more honest reviews than “actual” critics, who are probably bought off. That is what Hollywood executives are complaining about: unbiased opinions of their crappy movies is hurting their profits. Here’s an idea: make better movies!

Wow. Proof of how clueless Hollywood is the industry in which it operates. Folks under 50 are streaming in vast numbers, and have come to accept/be comfortable with much smaller screen viewing, choosing convenience and immediacy over resolution and pixels.

Thank you for this, just about to quote and comment. This is directly due to shitty education where they are trained that science is a set of fixed facts that are faithfully and accurately reported by the media (all media).

“For five days, we were told it was going to be on the east coast, and then 24 hours before it hits, we’re now told it’s coming up the west coast,” 52-year-old entrepreneur Jeff Beerbohm told the AP. “As usual, the weatherman, I don’t know why they’re paid.”

I don’t know, maybe actors/actresses shouldn’t be making hundreds of millions for a couple of months work? Maybe some of that money could be redistributed to hire more and better writers, researchers, art studios, support staff and all the other small and large cogs that make a movie. Maybe that could help make the

I feel like the movie went completely over the head of the author of this review. Many of these points are wrong or easily understood through the context the movie gives alone. I have not seen the original “It” movie (I know right? Idk how I managed not to after all these years) nor read the book but I had no problem

I’m An Old who read the book when I was a kid and saw the first movie when it first came out.

To be fair, I get where they’re coming from. When my partner and I get married, we’re not going to be doing it for the enormous financial benefits, legal benefits or out of sheer love. We’ve decided we’re going to get married specifically so we can oppress the freedoms of Christian bakers. That’s just how we roll.

i read Germaine Lussiers’ review after I read this crap.

I’ve seen criminals sneaking down flights of stairs that were less condescending than this review. It’s like Rich was expecting so much more from a Stephen King horror adaptation.

I dunno, read the book, I guess?

Well I guess someone has to take up the mantle of going against the majority of film critics.

Now playing

If ever you have fallen asleep watching Mean Girls on DVD, you know that it was already a musical as this played over and over and over.

All right, Wills, you can get that vasectomy now.

Now playing

The fact that she failed with the Alex Jones interview must be especially embarassing to her/NBC given what John Oliver and his staff managed to do. That segment was so good. Think what LWT could have uncovered if they had some of that sweet NBC money.

That movie exists, it’s Rachel Getting Married.