So I am curious what the end-game of such technology is. I remember reading in the Early 90's about Nanorobotics which could be used for all sorts of things. Everything from creating medicine inside our bodies, to full on bodily repair.
So I am curious what the end-game of such technology is. I remember reading in the Early 90's about Nanorobotics which could be used for all sorts of things. Everything from creating medicine inside our bodies, to full on bodily repair.
“Whites control the U.S. Supreme Court, both houses of Congress, the White House and the judiciary. Aside from ordering Ben Carson’s office furniture, they control every imaginable seat of power in government.”
Who is this group of ‘Whites”? Ah, I suppose you mean millionaires, and billionaires from family lines that…
Incorrect. If a baby can be taken from the womb, and transplanted into an artificial womb, this completely nullifies any argument about bodily autonomy. Children DO NOT belong to their mothers. They are not property. Once the child is removed from the womb, women no longer have any say what-so-ever as to any…
How does a comment from someone who obviously didn’t even read the article get 33 upvotes? Mind Blown.
What you fail to see is that you are guilty of the very same thing you are accusing pro-life feminists of. Meaning, you are advocating for laws based on your own personal opinions, and interests.
What you fail to see is that you are guilty of the very same thing you are accusing pro-life feminists of. Meaning, you are advocating for laws based on your own personal opinions, and interests.
What you fail to see is that you are guilty of the very same thing you are accusing pro-life feminists of. Meaning, you are advocating for laws based on your own personal opinions, and interests.
You fail to recognize that people’s views on the value a life may differ. Pro-Choice Advocates fully for women’s autonomy,…
Your math is based on a philosophy that is wrong imho. The chances of a specific person coming into existence is 100%. Assuming life exists already.
Point in case, people far smarter than you decided to store the bible, while you have a problem with it. Guess who’s the idiot here. There’s a case to be made for a religion which preceded us and influenced the art, literature, and thinking of of billions of people in many different countries.
There is nothing stupid what so ever about confirming the sentience of animals. In fact they will eventually be proved to be sapient also. The distinction between abstract thought and the type of thoughts animals have does not mean animals do not think at all. We can’t simply dismiss intelligence in animals because it…