I wouldn’t exactly say reliability=quality. Everything in the GM cars of the past was absolute shit, except the engine/drivetrain. Would a Chevy cavalier be a quality car then? It was reliable enough.

I used to think the koenigsegg s would be faster, because the numbers indicated it. Problem is, at least from what i’ve seen, they don’t get off the line very well at all. They may have a higher too speed (we may never know) but they’d almost certainly lose in a 1/4 mile race. The Rimac would pull harder from a dig,…

Sure, a purpose built drag car could soundly beat a Chiron. Hell, there are Honda civics that could humiliate it in a drag race. But against a production car? I’d be shocked if it lost to any production car. If you gain joy from beating down on stock cars in straight line speed, then this is a great car. That’s your…

It could win a drag race, if you consider that a race. Even if it can’t win a race, it still doesn’t mean it’s a pointless car, or that you can’t find joy in driving it.

Full autonomy= tens of thousands of people saved per year, tens of thousands more families intact, and that’s just in America. Being a car enthusiast is a hobby. If I had to give up driving for that reality (I don’t see a reason why I would, but hypothetically) I happily would.

By the reviews, the Chiron isn’t pointless on the track. It’s not a veyron. The veyron only cared about going fast in a straight line.

The general, goldbond, Buick, icy hot, etc all probably had to pay out the ass to get a household name like shaq on their commercials, which is probably why he did them.

It’s like every possible absurd thing is converging at once.

They sell an absolute shit ton of c classes and 3 series. A lot of people who can afford an accord could also afford a model 3 if they are willing to part with a bit more cash.

Same. I know this has been said a trillion times over the last 9 months, but I still can’t believe this shit is actually happening.

I’d agree with you, except that the headlights took away from the classy-ness of the mulsanne a bit. Personally i’d take a mulsanne over a phantom because I like the interior more, but the rolls looks a bit more stately imo.

People who like them. There’s no need to slap a stereotype on everything.

I’m pretty sure the gallery is that piece of glass set into the dash, adjacent to the infotainment screen. I’ll admit, I’m a sucker for that gallery thing, even though it’s stupid and ostentatious. I’d get someone to make me a hyper-realistic oil painting of a hot dog and put it in there.

The new trump-spec phantom, complete with headrest-mounted tablets permanently tuned to fox news, and doorcards with his skyline picture etched into them.

It’s a very subtle redesign, but that’s probably a good thing. The phantom is probably the classiest looking sedan on the market. It’s hard to capture that pre-war vibe in a modern car, but the phantom pulls it off.

Now I want to eat good cake and listen to good jazz in the back of a phantom.

Same. I live in California, so i’d love the cooled and ventilated seats, but i’d never use the heated seats. I don’t like being hot.

Yeah, I’m really getting tired of the cynicism on here. It’s not just the commenters, but the writers themselves. It seems like every article, every comment section, it’s just people bitching. Every new car is shit/ugly/too expensive, every innovative idea is stupid, everything sucks.

I love the huayra. The only thing that might make it better is the old na 7.3 liter, but i’ve learned to like the huayra’s sound over time. It’s muted, but it really sounds like nothing else on the road.

I like it. One of the only truly unique car interiors on sale today.