Two dudes telling people what to do! IT’S A DUDESPIRACY! SOMEBODY CALL THE PATRIARCHY POLICE!
Two dudes telling people what to do! IT’S A DUDESPIRACY! SOMEBODY CALL THE PATRIARCHY POLICE!
“Someone disagrees with something I agree with! I must belittle and insult them!” THE IRONING IS DELICIOUS.
Oh, look, another nontroversey.
‘Hulk is the chillest one there is.’ Please tell me that is not something that is actually said.
I...don’t like it. I really like 2NE1, and CL is very talented, but this is just like some weak dancehall crap. Disappointing, but maybe it’s just not for me.
Did her English record ever drop?
But there are people who don’t want it to come out. There are definitely people who are happy about it. One of the writers for VG247, Hillier, for example, was ecstatic. You can go check her Twitter. And that doesn’t count the people who say it is gross/sexist/misogynistic/etc. So...unless you are saying those people w…
I would call them sex negative prudes. I mean, humanity has a plethora of ways of expressing sexuality, right? I mean, do you like getting peed on? Do you like peeing on people? How do you feel about human furniture? Adult babies? Bleeding? All of those are are viable sexual outlets. People who are not into those are…
It’s not particularly ironic that the internet is doing that. In fact, it is really the only thing that could have occurred. Every single oppositional movement from political to cultural to martial has been about humanizing your opponent, to make them seem lesser. The internet does the heavy lifting of that particular…
Oh, feminism has done good, but again, we are back to the “face” of a movement versus what a movement has accomplished. Your movement is basically one of extremism, currently, along the lines of a fundamentalist group (and in many ways does remind one of a cult). Remember the whole WomenAgainstFeminism thing? Instead…
You know, I really try to avoid it. Didn’t use to be that way, but there’s really only so many incidences of people who say they are feminists doing things like physically attacking and being emotionally abusive to you (my ex), calling you a rapist by dint of having a penis (a college student neighbor), and pushing…
Never said it was. And it is just that, a generalization. It’s right there on the label: a general trend. And consider it was more than one person who was happy about it, I think it’s fair to say that some people were happy about it, and were happy about it for one reason. It’s the reasoning that I’m lumping these…
Cool story, bro. But seriously, I mentioned digital distribution for a reason: the largest cost of any game is making physical copies and distributing them. This is why it’s so popular with indie and small devs. Especially given that marketing for this game, because it is so niche, would be (most likely) limited…
Dealing with controversy was the point. Glad we agree. Thank you.
The concept of “not cost viable” is almost completely negligible at this point because of digital distribution, which the vast majority of the most recent DoA game was.
The vocal people who have no interest in the game, but deride it because it exists are the problem, and that is a problem that affects a number of…
There’s been meaning here? If there is, it’s obfuscated behind...whatever it is you’ve put to the fore, because I’ve seen nothing that resembles meaning, simply a lot of dissembling and, “Grrr...sexy bad unless I say it’s good.” I can’t seem to be winning because, as I’ve already said, there is no “winning”…
No one is calling for bans outright, no one is calling for censoring outright, but there is no critique of skill or whether something is appropriate for its genre or whether it’s done well...the only “discussion” is whether it offends somebodies poor wittle sensibilities and how it is bad for doing so. There is no…
Can you Kotaku an article? This article is one big Kotaku.
It was pleasant. Have a good one.
I have no particular bias against those who hold oppositional views, except that those oppositional views tend to fall into a very narrow set of arguments which only hold up when viewed within the lens of their own context.
How do I get that? Extracting meaning from the vapor of nuance, of course. The constant and…