It is considered near liquid as stocks can lose value when you sell. This value is paid out both in taxes as well as increasing the supply of stock available thus lowering its price.

Nobody will be able to dump billions worth of shares and have the stock maintain its value. Near liquid and liquid are not the same…

My point is the same as it was when I started.

Stocks are not “liquid”. There is a scale of liquidity. Stocks are closer to cash, but not as close as other investment avenues. The fact that they have to be sold and taxes have to be assessed on the sale make them not as liquid as other assets.

You started this whole…

I have, and stocks are not it. There is a scale of liquidity. If stocks are, anything that is saleable is.

You may consider stocks to be a liquid asset, and their liquidity is pretty good, but I would not consider them to be a liquid asset. Anything that requires taxes to be paid when using them, for my purposes, is not a liquid asset.

Because there is no defined list of “this is liquid, this is not” we are probably going…

Without being too vague, I was saying that converting an asset to cash, typically through sale, will result in taxes incurred.

You can’t go around selling stock without paying capitol gains tax on it.. assuming you make gains.

Same with the sale of anything. The easier the sale, the more liquid the asset is.

About the…

Technically, the only liquid asset is cash, and everything else requires some sort of transaction to be liquid.

There is a scale of liquidity and stocks are certainly closer to cash than they are to a house.

None of this matters though, because you are not taxed based on the liquidity of your assets, but rather, taxed…

Maybe you should adjust your thinking.

You swap a battery every time you need to fill up and stop charging at home.

Just like you do with fuel.

Sometimes you get worse fuel, sometimes you get better fuel. Batteries turn back into a commodity like they had been in consumer electronics for so long.

This idea that your…

It came from the truck passing at 8 seconds in. It is a dually, but only has one wheel on the driver’s side as it passes by the camera.

You are not going to be breaking that hard on the ring without more drive time and high speed air to cool the brakes. This was a stupid test, and a fire isn’t really that bad either.

The lower pay could be a probationary period like many high profile positions. This protects the company from issuing large options and huge payouts to someone who just quits after receiving them.... Sometimes these are 6 months, I’ve seen them as long as a year and as short as 2 months.

2 months... hmmm

Also, it is…

The male was in the role for YEARS before she came in. And the salary discrepancies are unconfirmed. She is only 2 months in. Highly likely a role like this comes with a lower pay probationary period protecting the company in the event the high profile hire doesn’t work out or is just there for a large payday...…

The way this is written, she was just treated badly in the past.... which is what they hired her to that role to change.

Then she gives up because she has no faith in leadership... when she is leadership.

It is amusing considering part of her complaint was that she was tokenized by the company.

So the articles tokenize her instead.

She took the job and they expected her to stay in the job to help promote change.

She recalls an incident from 2007... 14 years ago... where she felt marginalized. She stays at the job for 14 more years.

To then quit to make a statement after getting the top role.

Sorry, but this seems stupid. They admitted they made…

“But better”

My dude, I said above, stop pretending you are better than someone else because they made a mistake and are OWNING that mistake.

You have made mistakes in the past. We all have. To pretend you haven’t is flat out lying, and it makes your personality ugly.

Fuck off with your sexism concern trolling.

People are allowed to get confused by fake names on a platform they don’t use. Confusion, and then admitting you made that confusion, is not something that should be shamed.

You start shaming people for realizing they made a mistake and you wind up with people thinking they…

“That “all season” tires are fine in the winter. No, no they are not.”

This is where you are pretty ok if you have AWD and all season tires. They are not as good, but the majority of the country doesn’t get much snow during the winter. If you are in the mountains or the far north, then yeah, get some winter tires, but…

“Elon is referring to a previous proposal in Congress to tax the unrealized gains (i.e. the increase in value of a stock that hasn’t yet been sold) of billionaires; this proposal probably won’t go anywhere, but should.”

Oh it should, should it? How about we just avoid any more articles by Erik based on a future article…

This would be better if it was a braking force applied gauge so we can tell when the asshole driving it is resting his foot on the pedal.

This. We need multiplayer Alien Isolation, not 3rd person Left4Dead.

Still, I played it and I liked it.