jeremyturnley
illrigger
jeremyturnley

Forget opinion. Go with the ones the people who actually do tests on routers recommend:

Forget opinion. Go with the ones the people who actually do tests on routers recommend:

Yep, even Razer itself has had it for that long. Difference here is just location and default action, it’s within easy reach and programmed by default with the “only activate when pressed” function.

Yep, even Razer itself has had it for that long. Difference here is just location and default action, it’s within

You completely miss the point. Cars are designed to handle almost anything you throw at them, but planning for a head on with a semi is basically the same as planning for an asteroid strike - neither is possible, because PHYSICS. Unless someone finds a giant vibranium deposit somewhere, if you get hit head on by a

You just described an extremely common scenario for drivers (hard braking to avoid a t-bone collision under unexpected circumstances). Pretty much every driver sees a few of these in their lifetime. It’s absolutely something an autonomous vehicle would be expected to and able to respond to.

Yes, in the worst possible scenario, coming to a stop is not going to help. If a 747 was crashing down on you, it wouldn’t either. Nor would it help if a dinosaur-killer asteroid were about to hit the earth with your car at the epicenter. Strawman arguments are not valid because they assume circumstances that have

But here’s the thing: sometimes the safest course of action is to do nothing and let the safety features in the your car do their job - which is probably what happened here. There are a lot of things to think of here, and physics limits the options available to you in an incident like this. Most human drivers (if they

Apparently you needed to have your memory refreshed by the third response to the post, so at this point I am not shocked that you can’t remember what the original topic was.

If, apparently, “pedantic” now means “stays on the topic being discussed and doesn’t fall for false flag arguments”, I can live with that.

As long as she does so without being an ignorant ass like you, I don’t really care. My goal is to produce a person who can survive in public without people wanting to punch her in the face for being a dick, something your parents failed at.

She’s my stepdaughter, so you continue to prove you are an idiot. She also is apparently higher functioning that you, because she’s capable of seeing when she should just stop because she looks like a fool.

No, but my kid is, ass. You obviously have early onset dementia and ADD, since you have forgotten that the McMansion topic is what you brought up at the beginning of this thread. God forbid one of the people in a conversation actually stay on topic.

Let me explain why you are a moron:

And my point, moron is that you are wrong. The rich people you are talking about are not the majority of Republicans. The majority of them are the religious right, the unskilled workers, the people who are delusional enough to think that the Republican party is on their side, either by choice or not. You continue to

So, tell me what the average rural midwest town that a republican voter lives in is like? I lived in Cedar Rapids (where there were maybe a dozen McMansions), but had friends in Coralville (where there were a maybe a couple hundred), and various other smaller towns (where there were none).

I lived there for years as well, moved back to a real city in 2011. Most of rural midwest is small towns with a max of a couple hundred people between miles and miles of fields of crops. Most cities there are are cores of houses from the 60s or earlier with a few McMansion communities on the outskirts if the city has

I think you need to visit the rural areas in red states that always support the Republicans. I think you will be surprised at the lack of McMansions in those states.

This bill mode possible by the FCC removing net neutrality protections. If the protections stay in place, it would be challenged by the porn industry as a violation of the statutes. Of course, now they just need to challenge it as a free speech violation, which will likely get it thrown out by the first appeals court

The reason the government mandates those lines is for strategic military use, the fact that passengers ride them is just how Amtrak makes use of them beyond that. It seems old timey, but the government still has rail as a major part of its defense strategy for the reasons I mentioned above.

It’s not obsolete at all. The main purpose of rail is freight, not transit. Even discounting the immense cost differences, it’s easier to secure a rail line or road system for transport of vital materiel than air transport, and you can move a lot more at one time via rail than any other method. Provided a threat does