Under a Clinton Presidency we’d have no additional mental health funding and someone who you seem to show so much feigned concern for would be at great risk for being killed by police for the crime of having mental illness.

THIS. Exactly how I feel. I have honest questions. I dont “hate” Hilary , dont call her a “bitch”, I’m not not aware of what a big deal this for women. I am all for that. This not about that. I have policy questions. I want to understand, why Hilary? People get so super pissed straight away, I cant have an honest…

Whoa now, you get your factual data out of here! We blindly support Hillary and nothing is going to change!

170 well respected economists endorsed Sanders’s economic plan.

Crickets from the Hillary people, as expected.

This is the real dope. Bernie’s minor transgressions can’t begin to touch the planetary-sized mountain of Hillary’s. To boot, she’ll be a mediocre president, simply continuing the legacy of Obama, who himself continued the legacy of GW Bush. I don’t deny she’s smart, driven, calculating, a bulldog that no one wants to…

You’ll get that behaviour on both sides especially in candidates like these which polarize people, a lot of Bernie supporters are disaffected voters many of whom gave up on the political system a long time ago and plenty of whom have lost all sense of decorum when it comes to debating.. it’s important to keep in mind…

what was the fight about? clearly they did a terrible job, and from some of the sloppy arguments overheard on MSNBC’s coverage of the Iowa caucus, I can do better; so what are the points of contention?

Hold onto your knickers, let’s take a step back and see where we are...

Hillary Clinton:

If you don’t want a debate in New York because you don’t think you’ll do well... Isn’t there a bigger issue at hand?

Clinton doesn’t know how to work the system, she personifies the system, as in fitting effortless into it, while giving the perception that she would fight for the average citizen’s wellbeing, when she’s only interested in upholding the status quo. I’d pick the guy with the great ideas who might win over the public…

True. I’m not sure if it’s fair to call Sanders unrealistic if she’s posting things even more unlikely. That’s dishonest.

So you don't actually care about things like voting history and campaign financing. Got it.

Except one is still backed by Wall Street and billion-dollar lobbyists, didn’t vote no to more wars in the Middle East, etc. ... but she has shown a penchant for reproductive autonomy for women, but then again, so has Sanders. They’re not the same at all.

What do you mean when you say they’re both establishment? Is there no difference between them when it comes to money in politics?

Right, but Bernie has only been affiliated with the Democratic party for less than a year. Prior to that, he was the longest serving independent in U.S. Congressional history. So, that gives him some credibility as being outside the two-party establishment.

Except Sanders has been fighting for social change the entire time while Clinton has been fighting on behalf of Banks and trying to go to war.

Right? It’s the polished phoniness of it all.

Her saying, “I just don’t understand what that means” is one of the most establishment things she could do. It’s the equivalent of “I don’t remember” in Congressional testimony. I’m a woman and a feminist and I really would have loved to support a female candidate, but Hillary is so disingenuous and self-interestedly…