jennyoakie--disqus
IMHO
jennyoakie--disqus

You are the one who has been on the attack. My initial reply was meant as a joke. Jewish people tend to be a little sensitive about these type of jokes and that was the point I was making. Again, you don't seem to get irony. The only reason I gave context about who I was is because you started assuming you knew me.

I can see your point. I think the quality of the show took a hit when Rich Blomquist left.

Seems so ludicrous now.

The best replacement host would have been John Oliver, but he wisely moved on to HBO where he seems to be getting much more attention. Jon Stewart leaving will be a major obstacle no matter who takes gig. Personally, I find it a bad choice because he is so young. But I'm an outraged internet ageist.

I don't remember that at all.

The reason I said that you don't understand irony, is because my first reply was meant as a joke. But you immediately starting attacking my character, and used a reference that I found offensive (i.e. the waiter comment) that the explanation was beside the point. You're continued assumption about my life is

Most commenters who complain about 'Internet Rage' are the most outraged.

I have no exact objective here. I just like trolling trolls. And you're assumption that I'm lying and that I'm faking my feelings is continually false.

I guess I could learn a lot about restraint and impeccable wording from you.

You've done much more finger-wagging and name calling than I have. All of your comments on this thread are angry and aggressive. Dismissing me about wasting time on the internet is the definition of a weak argument because you're continuing this thread with me. Also, I never claimed to be 'enlightened'. Also, you

You ask me a question: how many black people do you know? I answer it. You claimed to know that I don't have any black friends, and I say that I do and that I have many friends with other nationalities. Then you denounce my statement as phony. You belabor the point statement I made about the doctor, refusing to

That's fair, of course. There is never a 'right' opinion regarding any artistic medium.

You clearly haven't read my last comment. I made it very clear that that I have personal relationships with other black people, Latinos, Asians, Native Americans, and Persians. Many of them are also gay. I live in Oakland California, and as a heterosexual white woman, I'm a minority here. Again, the only reason I

From my perspective, valid motivation for a fictional character is different than a valid motivation from a real person. I think many people want exactly the same thing form their loved ones, but don't necessarily verbalize it. This may make him unlikable, untrustworthy, or manipulative, but it's honest. That makes

I'm excited about seeing Slow West, which apparently Mendolhsen is great in.

Right?! Or Mad Men, god those reviews were laborious.

PS: I've read through some of your other comments on Disqus, and this type of animosity seems like a trend for you. When responding to an article about homophobia in films your answer you stated: "Pointless article. Guess what? Straight men don't like penis in their face. Some moves have mined that for comedy instead

Once again, you're assuming you know me, I have a black lesbian roommate, and other black friends and acquaintances. I also have Latino friends, Asian friends, and Native American friends. Hint: if you live in a town like Oakland, there is no possible way to not befriend someone of color. Whites are pretty much

It's very possible I will check it out. I'm enjoying the renaissance of Bob Odenkirk. I should be more accurate in stating that I have watched BB, but months after it ended. And two years after I left ABQ. So I didn't watch it on AMC. Also, I had to force myself to get through two seasons on Netflix, and I couldn't

Good points. It is odd reflecting on Terriers so many years later. It seem quaint compared to the type of programming they have now.