The 70s had a few cute things but so many brown and orange polyester with weird cuts, especially men’s pants and of course BELTED SWEATERS that...no.

Late 80s early 90s was terrible, yes. I’m thinking later 90s with the more toned-down (not crazy) bootlegs, LBDs etc. And though I didn’t care for the pastel shirts with…

not gonna lie, I love this

It’s my favorite color being terrorized this way, too :(

So basically she rolled around in some Laura Ashley 80s French country revival wallpaper.

Also yuck

I am OK with the top, not the bottom.

The cut is basically OK, but the lavender and white shininess makes it look like it was stolen off a doll or a Better Homes and Gardens spread from the mid-80s

style, OK. Color, NO.

I kind of love this, like Dallas meets the 20s via Working Girl

That silhouette is awful, but it’s way more 80s than 90s to me

Really? You’ve seen the 70s and 80s, right? I see 90s looks I still like, but almost none that I like from the previous 2 decades. Hell I see how 80s fashion (including neon and big gold tone jewelry) has made kind of a comeback and I think “NO PEOPLE WE’VE BEEN THROUGH THIS. IT DIDNT LOOK GOOD THEN AND IT DOESNT LOOK…

Either that or she stole it off a matador.

OLE!

In Asia most cat cafes have a resident cat who lives there and is not up for adoption. Obviously, the Catfe should continue housing cats who need homes and adopting them out, but perhaps for business’ sake, having one resident cat as well isn’t a bad idea.

Plenty of people worship a god because they feel they should, but deep down feel no real affinity for it.

And no, we don’t all worship a god.

That could well be that they traveled with their families to see extended family on Christmas. I never had school on December 24 so by scheduling it the school is kinda asking for a high absence rate...when I was young I wouldn’t have been in either, because we traveled to grandma’s.

I wouldn’t have even been bashful.…

Yeah but defeatism isn’t great either. I’ve got as little sympathy for “oh well this is my lot, best just live it” as for whininess that accomplishes nothing.

The standard of work, then. But who determines that? Clearly it can’t be trusted to studios, and deciding who put out the better acting performance is so subjective as to be impossible to pin to a financial amount. With the idea that all actors being paid the same impossible on its face, I have no idea.

The standard of work isn’t equal in many cases to the money generated. Transformers made gobs of money, that doesn’t mean the standard of acting was good. Some brilliantly acted movies don’t make tons of money (some aren’t trying to) - but the standard is actually higher. So...no.

I don’t think it matters. For sports, similar work should garner similar pay.

I don’t see any gender-based reason why disparate box office draw should be an issue. There’s no reason why a man should draw more at the box office than a woman, and vice versa, based solely on their genders. So no.