You don’t know their real history. These kinds of public displays of sympathy after equally public friction read as very manipulative to me.
You don’t know their real history. These kinds of public displays of sympathy after equally public friction read as very manipulative to me.
Sounds to me like she does want to move on and SJP wants to keep pretending like they were more than coworkers b/c it’s good for her brand.
#TeamKim
There was an article many years ago in Vanity Fair that I read on this — 1990s probably — that made it VERY clear that not only was it NOT statutory rape but that she was crying and telling him no repeatedly.
Well, yes, this is the heart of the matter. This is why a slim majority of white women voted for 45 and even more voted for a pedophile in Alabama. Because those white women care more about what white men think of them than they do about themselves let alone other women.
This looks fucking adorable, and I am all in. I uncritically loved The Mindy Project and intend to follow Mindy around from show to show just like I do with Mike Schur.
I’d tell people to read the thread and decide for themselves, but you dismissed it, so... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Thank you! Plot twist: she dismissed our entire convo probably b/c she realized how bad it made her look while she was having her “good” evening.
Note to any sad comment-reader who made it this far in this incredibly stupid thread:
Shallow-privileged-white-girl says what?
I know you are, but what am I?
I know you are, but what am I?
You and I are having parallel bang-heads-against-the-wall attempts at reasonably discussing this with DrDonna whose self-righteousness is so fucking off-the-charts that I’m starting to think she was fully aware of what she was doing up top.
I know you are. But what am I?
I’m just matching stubborn for stubborn, here. Are you angry? You keep going, too? Are you unreasonable? You haven’t stopped replying to my replies?
Ah, and now the accusation that I am ANGRY because being angry invalidates anything one says. Anger is something one should never be when one is discussing issues. Emotion is to be avoided at all costs and the moment one exhibits emotion, one’s points are invalidated.
Yeah, no.
If I reexplained using examples of trans misogyny being derailed by silly straight girl examples, would you get it then? Or do you only care about bigotry when it centers on your own experience?
I’m not looking for a fight — you accused me of using a strawman, which I didn’t. What you appear to be trying to do in this entire thread, though, is stop people from making you uncomfortable! And if that is not your intent, then you need to look at what you’re doing and reconsider your approach.
Oh, was it a strawman? Could you explain how it was a strawman when I used specific examples from the conversation to highlight the shallowness of your comment?