I adore it and think she looks amazing. I really like her.

I can't tell — are you thinking I'm asking that seriously?

How does this explain how he dresses himself in the morning?

That is a level of stupid that is truly hard to comprehend. How does this man dress himself in the morning? How did he manage to get the dog into a vehicle and successfully locate the animal shelter? Because this man? This man is about as fucking ignorant as it is possible to be. He is a cartoon of stupidity. He is…

Ugh, what a small-minded, small-hearted, grim person. It kind of makes a bit more sense of Whitney to me.

*horror movie screaming!!!*

I wonder what the Unconventional Materials challenge will entail?

You are a woman, and you wrote in a forthright and sardonic manner. From what I am told by the helpful folk on the internet who condescend to use their doctorates in psychology to diagnose me based on our brief comment exchanges, that means you are constantly raging and angry and your life is miserable and stuff.

Probably because the number and volume of outraged screeches that would have ensued from just having the word 'Porn' show up during the purest and most sacred day of family television ever would have broken out all the windows at network HQ.

You are not overreacting. If she couldn't put herself into the spirit of the memorial she was visiting, she should not have gone there.

Maybe he's using fashion to deal with the pain? Did he crack an inappropriate joke, too? Because I hear that really helps people through the difficulty of hearing about bad stuff that happened to other people.

I wasn't getting pissy but never mind. You "had to be that person" and it set me off. I guess I had to be that person, too. Sorry.

Sure, but the point was that the original person was talking about the verdict based on the case presented and that it was the correct verdict for the case made and you were mad about that, but that wasn't a value judgement on any shoulds — lots of things should be different and if they were then their consequences…

If they couldn't prove the case they brought then she shouldn't have been convicted. That is the system working.

I never said you did? But if you're telling people they're feeding their pets crap food, you are judging their choices and presuming they can afford better.

Yeah, no. Dog food choice is not the same as name-calling, and it is presumptuous and judgey to tell people what to buy just because you can afford to make choices. (A note that I buy my pets expensive, high-quality stuff because I can, but if I couldn't afford it, I'd do the best I could with the cheaper options…