Sounds painful.

Horse Hell is probably a lot like the middle part of Black Beauty which was *unpleasant.*

Any mythology, really. Lots of horrific births and foreign objects emerging bloodily from various orifices in many mythologies. But STILL.

Doctor Who and Amy Pond, you are my favorite show, too.

*hork*

I'm sorry, but what is that even supposed to mean in a religious context? "Hoo-boy, I horked up something crazy! God LOVES/(HATES?) me!"

Hey, thanks for that super-timely response. You still offer the internet equivalent of a conspiracy theory so no points for you. MonkeyT offered actual evidence which, while not conclusive is still pretty strong, but I'm sure your "my opinion, let me show you eet repeatedly" approach works for some people.

You say there's no point in believing there aren't gods and you say it's about not believing either way, and then you say you never have believed. A lot of atheists have never believed. All the word atheist means is that one doesn't believe in any gods.

I posted the video in response to my other reply.

At about 1:14 it kicks in. People have gif'd this all over tumblr.

If they go with the slow-burn superpower acquisition version of Supes (that he gets stronger the longer he's under the yellow sun) this would make sense. That's kind of how they're playing it in the New 52. Not sure how that would work with the other Kryptonians unless they'd already been here before he shows up. Or…

I don't know... you seem pretty certain of your assessment of a large and diverse group of people.

Every one who gets questions like this needs to take a page from Anne Hathaway and Scarlett Johannson and just push that right back on the idiots asking the questions. I loved Anne's — she made that jerk SO uncomfortable by pretending she thought he was asking for personal fitness advice.

It's certainly used to mean whatever the person identifying as agnostic wants it to mean. It's vague and waffly and conditional. And the superior stance people take at other's people's decision-making abilities is *silly.* One's inability or refusal to draw a conclusion based on available data or strength of faith is…

That makes it more likely but it is not conclusive. People can be pretty brand-loyal, and there seem to be a lot of GoPro videos out there (but then people namedrop their Macs and shit all the time, and that isn't some Apple viral campaign; that's culty fannishness).

No, it's still silly. Lots of things are silly no matter why they exist.

I think even saying you're welcome might read as me being a bit full-of-it, so I'll just say thanks!

Not sure why you keep saying that. I don't think my position is default; I think it's my position and of course I am convinced of my current stance. You're just fannying about with above-it-all rhetoric which is fine, but I'm not going to vague myself up to satisfy you because why the hell would I do that? I don't…

The tagline will be a single word:

Oh, please, it is not clearly anything. And viral marketing for what? Dramamine? Sunsets? Nameless piers? Laughing camera-owners?