I get that you’re angry at Bippity for some reason or other, but they’re right about the historically high tax rates in this country.

Truly, the only right and just action to have taken would have been to not sign the NDA, not taken $250,000 and then subjected herself to the inevitable lifetime of harassment and verbal abuse from the army of deluded stans that Musk collects like Pokemon whilst still being shitcanned by the guy who sexually harassed…

Is buying silence consistent with supporting free speech?

We’re pointing out that a free speech champion probably wouldn’t (1) buy someone’s silence and (2) if they did, would probably let that person out of that deal without consequences so the person could talk about a matter that has already been made public.

Supporting free speech doesn’t mean supporting all types of speech

See “We support the First Amendment, except when you say mean things about us when we’re in power and then we’re throwing you in jail”

It is not a secret that the right make “free speech” a very ambiguous concept, applying it when they want, and making it more ambiguous when it’s convenient to them. The point of this article is about how people with power exploit this. Throw money at the situation, buy an NDA, then start spinning the story to their…

They do this so that the “reasonable” republicans have cover when they vote for these idiots. The full-on MAGAs love it because they know the truth. But, if they fully leaned into it without pretending to toe the line, they would begin to lose their coalition and the more center-leaning GOP voters would just stay home.

Except only one party favors racism, bigotry, claims CRT exists where it doesn’t, claims trans people do things that they don’t, and then explains that gay people ‘recruit’ more people into their ranks, oh, and also believes that the entire Democratic power side is made up of Satanic worshippers who use children’s…

I guess because she didn’t refer to any particular person/people that may be tricky?

Yeah “pedo” is not a catch all for “kids”. If it were, it’d be pedotrician not pediatrician.

If they're grifting on behalf of kids, isn't that a good thing? Like Robinhood for babies or something?

“rather than present ANY PLAN or urgency to address the nationwide baby formula crisis”

Huh. That seems like something you can readily find without making a stupid fucking bill with a stupid fucking name.  

We already count the “unborn” by tracking live births per year. That’s why we know we don’t have a enough people to feed capitalisms gaping maw which is easily 1/3rd of the reason people want forced birth.

This is 10,000% a talking point handed to him from more senior republicans to deflect the bad press he’s been getting lately. This dweeb did NOT think of something that clever or do-able.

What the fuck? Literally he is not “living with decisions he doesn’t agree with” if he is signing on to overturn 50 years of precedent and multiple rulings.   

I don’t have a problem with the ‘Outcomes’ I don’t agree with, you smug Prick. Its the ‘Outcomes’ that are based on the reasonings of a man that believes women are witches and a husband can’t rape his wife, you corrupt Bag of Hot Air.

I’m not a legal or constitutional scholar by any means, but it is my understanding that a SCOTUS justice can indeed be impeached and convicted. Of course, that would take the Dems actually using their majority to impeach the motherfucker, regardless of the fact that he won’t be convicted.

I was initially against modification of SCOTUS, afraid of the future ramifications of whatever party is in power monkeying with it to fit their goals. Later became reticent, but now have finally decided that if RvW is overturned, it’s the last straw for me. After McConnell’s bullshit blocking of Federal judge…