jenbug
jenbug
jenbug

Whore pills? Really?

I watched the video. The flying tampon scene (with the stars) actually made my day.

It was completely necessary for the show since it was the only reason that the premiere even made the news.

Is there a "Florida" tag on this site? Because there should be.

.

The Minister's Black Veil.

Cover his face and I'd give that ad a solid 6.5/10.

Is this the same Gaston that got told off by that little girl? If so, this man is my new personal hero.

May Leelah find in heaven the peace she was denied on Earth.

And now their baby is an American citizen so congratulations

"They want to make milestones and money and blow records out of the water with insane sales numbers while doing so, and they want to do that as equals, not as artists banking on the curves and higher vocal registers of their gender or the "end of men" that isn't happening."

Right? Can't we have a discussion about separation of church and state without insulting other people's religions?

This entire manages to stereotype an entire population based on a tiny sample size and narrow specifications and the fact that you think it's "advocating for the improved welfare of men" is interesting.

You and I and everyone else both know that if the genders were reversed and people used these faux statistics to stereotype women, there would be mass outcry. They say outright "Men are stupid than women" and then follow it up with "Shocking. Are you feeling faint with surprise? Do you need to have a seat? No?" And

I agree wholeheartedly with your last sentence. But there's a difference between pandering to anti-feminists and making feminism appealing. Articles like this are the first thing that people who don't subscribe to feminism point to when they say that equality isn't the ultimate goal of the movement. And I know this

Yes, because a sample size of 318 people over 10 years (an average of 32 people each year) lets you conclude that 3.5 billion people tend to be stupider than the other 3.5 billion. The only alarming thing is extrapolation for clickbait.

My only purpose in invoking the Nobel prize was to show that one award can't be used to make such a sweeping generalization. If "Men are alarmingly dumb" isn't a generalization, then someone please take me back to elementary school.

I don't understand how yesterday, people on Jezebel were all over the new Pixar "Inside Out" trailer for perpetuating outdated stereotypes, and here we are doing the same thing. I don't understand...

Doesn't achieve anything for feminism = gives more ammunition to anti-feminists. Not everyone is going to get the author's purpose/underlying satirical nature and to be honest, the whole "dumb men" thing isn't even funny or clever anymore.