I really find it hard to give a single solitary fuck about any of this.

I do not like Howard Stern. Orpah has every right to post whatever she wants. This take, the article, is absolutely dog shit. Stern has no problem with Oprah the black woman having shit, he has, and this is definitely examinable, but he has a problem with her posting her wealth on social media and clearly stated it.…

Pretty much; if he were some broke guy making these statements, I would say he was jealous,but his net worth is $650 million, so I don’t think he couldn’t get anything Oprah has. 

Oprah flaunts her wealthy living standard on various social media. So it shouldn’t come as a surprise when someone like Stern makes a negative comment. Not everyone is into celebrities flaunting their immense wealth and may take umbrage when celebrities do that. No big deal. Not every criticism of Black celebrities is…

His comments have nothing to do with the wealth of a black woman.  It’s just a comment about Oprah.  Is this the first you’ve heard of Howard Stern?

Hey at least he didn’t mention her relationship with Weinstein.

like black people don’t criticize rich white folks?  GTFO  asshole racist scumfuck. 

Black women cannot be criticized. I guess they’re even more fragile than Karens, the way people react whenever they get called out...

Oprah, like all other billionaires out there, doesn’t really need your help here.

There are so many idiotic points argued in this article that it’s difficult to know where to begin, so I’ll just address a couple of things.

These are not real people let alone real black people. Its a world with dragons and magic. 

“My issue us that no one seems competent to rule.”

An out of control and irredeemably corrupt police force.

She did not eviscerate him. She derailed the conversation to lecture him on trans-inclusive language, and then accused him of causing trans people to commit suicide because he was confused about trans-inclusive language.

Also, the talking point isn’t “the supreme court’s reversal of roe was radical and took away women’s rights” became “democrats think men can give birth and any language criticizing them is violence.” She did not eviscerate him. She derailed the conversation to lecture him on trans-inclusive language, and then accused…

Yeah, I’m honestly tired of these headlines in liberal-leaning publications saying some right-wing loon was “eviscerated”. Even as a figure of speech they’re taking all the meaning out of it.

When I think about that term, I’m thinking about someone having a point made at them from which there is no escape, that sits…

If only clapbacks had any impact on policies.