But not many of those folks are suing the "milk industrial complex" when they find out they are lactose-intolerant - right?

The lawsuit is "excessive and inaccurate claims of effectiveness in terms of actually giving people energy" - which is a wholly subjective point to begin with. People need to exercise personal judgement and common sense and not fall back on a product selling them something. THAT is my point. You shouldn't be so…

No, you said I was a commenter who only read the title of the post. I read the entire post - didn't change my opinion. You are correct - advertisers should not be allowed to make false claims, and that is well within the confines of the law. A marketer saying a product "gives you wings" is not a claim that lies in…

Nope - here we have person who is an attorney. This lawsuit was allowed because it falls into a loophole...not because it was false advertising (as the title post would have you believe).

They do- and Buzz dances with Usher on the reg. Lucky IS after your Lucky Charms though - sorry, that's just the truth.

Seriously? You think those companies need to be sued over saying those things? You think that it's worth the court's time, and it's a viable lawsuit?

But in the meantime I can sue it, right?

Carry on - wasn't looking for a fight...was expecting a dialogue.

A fight against whom? I was commenting on the ridiculousness of the case.

I would like for our judicial system to have some reign over the people who don't have common sense - but when suits like this get not only green-lit but won, it's a losing battle.

My point was that Red Bull wasn't really guilty of false advertising per se - they were guilty of selling a concept that - because someone bought that concept - it ended up in court.

And evidently people who get to sue companies based on their advertising.

So - are you actually saying that people believe Milk Does a Body Good, Campbell's Soup is MMM Good, Cocoa Puffs can raise immunity to childhood diseases, PomJuice can help you cheat death...etc...and the list goes on and on.

I never understood how anyone could mistake those lyrics for anything romantic...but they did.

You should Google the story behind the founder of Netflix and how decided to create an alternative to Blockbuster - it was ALL ABOUT THE FEES. That's a huge money-maker for any company whose customer base can be relied upon to swallow BS fees in lieu of what they want/need in the short term.

Traveling companion Claudia?!?!

Ever heard "Every Breath you Take" by The Police? I've been to WEDDINGS where it has been played - and it is the preeminent ode to stalking.

She peed in a champagne bucket in a wedding gown, but HE is white trash. K.

Typed that comment without thinking - Drew/Jonathan not Drew/Scott.

I think Drew is handsome but Scott isn't. Weird considering they do look more alike than most twins do in adulthood.