jellofelony
jello felony
jellofelony

Can most of the male writers on this site not write articles that sound like you’re all fucking sneering at your keyboards when you have to talk about something/one/etc that you’re not exactly 100% fans of?

So how mad are you going to be when he doesn’t get impeached and ends up being reelected? 

I was watching the Jimquisition on this the other day and he made a fairly interesting point about Blizzard on this one. They argue that the matter is to keep politics out and keep the optics on the game itself. But if someone were to post something that is arguably political but less controversial (and certainly not

The person who will follow Obama’s lead is Warren.

This. I watched a judge chew out a 45 year old dude who halfway through the selection process stood up and told him he had forgot he had a wedding he was in.

This was not a review. This was a Wikipedia-type scene-by-scene, detailed, spoiler-stuffed breakdown of every major plot-point in a movie you didn’t like. That’s not how you review a movie. Please stop writing whatever the hell this was and calling it a “review”.

It is almost as if people are trying to will a tragedy into existence. At this point folks are basically challenging any deranged sociopath to act, and if/when one does those same people are going to pat themselves on the back for seeing it coming as if they played no role in its occurrence.

Jesus Christ, I cant wait for this movie to come out so it can go away and knock off with all this manufactured drama.

Variety’s Editor in Chief Claudia Eller reacted to the news by writing, ‘Are you kidding me?? Is this unprecedented???’”

Don’t shame “snitching”. Exposing criminals is in the interest of society as a whole, and we want more people to come forward, not less. Yes, we’re talking about a garbage person, but the information he provides is valuable. And there is nothing valuable, or even moral, in remaining loyal to a criminal gang. So, don't

Democrats: “Bernie is bad on race.”

I think it’s embarrassing that they won’t release the vote totals, almost certainly because it would show the votes of 50-something “leadership” members being counted as though they were equal to the votes of tens of thousands of rank-and-file party members, and effectively overturning their support for Sanders. The

They will never show the vote totals because they vote totals will make them look like stupid corrupt assholes.  

So I take it this is WFPs latest distraction attempt to avoid releasing the vote totals?

Too bad he can’t blame his past homophobia on people hacking his blog.

This is par for the course with Nathan. He doesn’t show any real engagement with the industry, and jump on the over sensitivity band wagon like his job depends on it. It’s a thankless job, really.

Oh look, someone is proclaiming “hot take” reinforced with a meme. Clever!

AVClub, or How I Learned to Stop Caring About a Film’s Quality and Become a New Moral Majority.

Except the author (very briefly) mentions applying this outside of cities: “And if you don’t live in a city—or don’t want to—banning cars benefits you, too.”

Typical Gizmodo article.