What about evidence for their primary claim — that computer glasses are better than no glasses?

Yeah, you cannot hurt your eyes (as in cause them permanent damage or contract pathological eye diseases) by spending a lot of time looking at computer monitors or other screen devices. That’s not how it works, and anyone who says it does is feeding a line of bullshit, most likely to sell you something you don’t need.

Just wrote almost the exact same comment a minute ago. Younger people, especially those who’ve never needed glasses before, will often go way longer than they should without a full eye exam. As you get older, near accommodation diminishes, but your eyes can keep up the facade of crisp near vision for a while, it just…

It’s also worth noting that, if you’re feeling eye strain / tiredness after looking at a computer screen all day, it may be the result of a bona fide near vision problem in need of correction.

Says the butthurt incel.

I’m dying to see what you think are some film greats.

You’re the one who thought it would be ridiculous that someone would consider Christopher Nolan to be the greatest director ever (he’s not) and when I point that some of his problems include plot holes and/or inconsistencies, and some bad storytelling, you’re disagreeing?

You sound like you’re trying to convince yourself that you enjoy anything other than fucking shitty MCU movies. You’re certainly not convincing anyone else.

We have a fucking edgelord movie “snob” here folks.

The very mention of “plot holes” tells me everything I need to know about your grasp of film. You sound like the average asshole who thinks Shawshank Redemption is the greatest movie ever made and gets all his takes from Cinema Sins. Just shut the fuck up already.

I live in CA and can’t tell you how many assholes refused to vote after Bernie didn’t beat Hillary. As long as people act like fucking adults and don’t throw temper tantrums if Bernie doesn’t win I’m OK.

When I read about Elizabeth Warren criticizing Google for putting its own restaurant reviews over Yelp’s in search results, my visceral response was, “Yeah, and ... ?” Like, that’s just an issue of promoting better/more helpful results, not unfairly targeting a competitor. Everyone knows Yelp is horrible.

Admit it, if Harris were topping the poll, you’d have no problem with the implication that it tells us something about the current lay of the land for the Democratic primary. The reason why you’re downplaying the significance of it is because Sanders leads the pack of announced candidates.

It’s funny how these unity people lecture Bernie supporters while absolutely refusing to listen to anything we say or change themselves in any way.

Therefore, using Iowa or NH as an early indicator of a winner still remains ridiculous.

Engaged people will vote to help themselves, we need to encourage non engaged people show up

stop making comments like this and the OP comment will not be necessary.

No, he was telling the truth about his intentions. Boys are brought up to echo that chivalrous ideal, and to not display at least public adherence to it is taboo. And let’s face it, it’s equally embarrassing for a boy to win or lose to a girl at wrestling. If you lose, you just lost to a girl. If you win, it was a…

No, we’re going to get Sanders, and you’re going to love his presidency.

It’s going to be hilarious watching people like you pretending not to love a Bernie presidency for 8 years.